Twenty that we know about

We live in interesting times, the desperation in which the powers that be went too via the celebrity perverts in an effort so I believe to shift the public's gaze away from the mass grooming trials taking place all over the country has now blown up in their faces in the Westminster historic paedophile claims. The BBC now claims that there is evidence on 20 figures in the establishment, I reckon there's probably more and that there's an effort under way to divert attention or at least blame it on the dead...
BBC.

There is evidence at least 20 prominent paedophiles - including former MPs and government ministers - abused children for "decades", a former child protection manager has claimed.
Peter McKelvie, whose allegations led initially to a 2012 police inquiry, said a "powerful elite" of paedophiles carried out "the worst form" of abuse.
He said the network extended into both the House of Lords and the Commons.
The government has already announced two reviews into claims of abuse.
Home Secretary Theresa May told the House of Commons the first review would be a wide-ranging inquiry - similar to the inquiry into the Hillsborough disaster - led by an independent panel of experts on law and child protection.
The second review - which is to be led by head of the NSPCC Peter Wanless - would cover how police and prosecutors handled information given to them, she told MPs.

The second investigation is probably the one which will do the most damage as I rather expect that if they had any sense the police and prosecutors involved will have kept details as to who, where, when and how the cover up originated with. It may even be that they kept tabs or copies of the evidence they were told to ignore or bury.
One laughable meme going around instigated by leftards is that this is a Tory thing as it happened under their arch-nemesis Thatcher, unfortunately for them the main file lost under Brittan 's watch had been compiled mostly during the previous years of Labour government, though there are rumours of one prominent Tory being involved.
Again though I suspect like the celeb trials the sacrificial lambs will be either dead or no longer in power and thrown to the wolves as a sop to keep the real villains safe. I still suspect there's a child abuse ring operating in the shadows in Westminster and they'll do everything in their power to prevent their exposure to the cold light of day.

The missing link

There are a lot of people out there getting on their high horse about Google and a ruling by the European Court of Justice. Seems Google are removing links to certain 'activities' by certain people owing to a privacy ruling. Seems the objectors out there believe that the past is about to be whitewashed by the depraved and evil amongst us.
You do have to wonder just what these people are smoking, or what they hope to get from this storm in a teacup...
Mail.

The name Mario Costeja Gonzales probably will not ring an instant bell in your mind. You might well guess that he was one of the kids who went out in the first round of Wimbledon.
In reality, however, he is an obscure Spaniard who has prompted a global storm, appalling everyone who cares about censorship.
Some years ago, Senor Gonzales got into financial bother. He was obliged to sell his house to pay a gambling debt.
Today, like many of us with such little embarrassments in our past, he would prefer that people did not know about this bad episode.
He decided to bring a lawsuit, demanding that all references should be deleted from the internet. The case wound its way through a succession of law courts.
Then, in May, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg passed judgment.
Senor Gonzales won a right such as few fairy stories have ever dared confer: to airbrush his life-story on his own terms.
A precedent — a crazy precedent — was set. The court decreed that every citizen in Europe has a ‘right to be forgotten’.
The ruling required Google to remove irrelevant or excessive personal information about European individuals from European search results upon request.
Whoever you may be, high or low, you are, therefore, granted Groundhog Day privileges by courtesy of Europe: to rewind the movie of your life, omitting the nasty bits.

The real clue is of course Google, do people really think that Google is the only search engine out there? Granted it's the most popular, but it isn't the only one and the ones based in the USA (and outside of the EU) will simply stick two fingers up at this ruling and allow their search spiders to correlate data  in pretty much the same way Google does. You can even use composite search engines like Dogpile or DuckDuckGo (which unlike Google doesn't track or spam you) which links to a lot of search engines in one and will often dredge up some obscure information the powers that be wish were forgotten forever. Hell just Google search engines if you so desire as Google hasn't hidden them away.
The information about these miscreants or people wanting privacy has not been removed, all Google has done is remove the links to them, Google does not have permission to destroy data so it's still out there. If you are lazy enough to just use Google then you deserve anything you get (or in this case don't get) the truth is still out there... for given values of truth plus numerous lies.
In essence this is still a ruling that I do not agree with from the ECJ, but, for those who are not in the public eye I do believe a moratorium after a certain length of time is warranted on the mistakes of the past. For those in the public eye, however I believe living by the sword means dying by it occasionally and politicians of a certainty ought not to be able to hide their past sins/mistakes.
But as for censorship? Well it's just Google, there are other search engines out there and the information is still there, it's just not linked to by one search engine amongst hundreds...

It's not a smear if it's true

The links between Harriet Harman, her husband Jack Dromey, a former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt and the National Council for Civil Liberties (a left wing pressure group) to the odious Paedophile Information Exchange have been hitting the headlines for a week or so now, though to me this is old news as The Slog had more or less exposed the entire sordid episodes several years ago although then the MSM didn't want to know and their discovery really wasn't as it was no secret.

Still we do have the usual damage limitation exercise going on...BBC.

Harriet Harman has accused the Daily Mail of running a "politically-motivated smear campaign" against her.
The newspaper has reported that a civil liberties group she used to work for had links to paedophile rights campaigners in the 1970s and 1980s.
The Labour deputy leader told the BBC she had never been an "apologist for paedophilia" and had sought to protect children from abuse during her career.
But the newspaper said she had failed to answer its questions.
From 1978 to 1982 Ms Harman was legal officer at the National Council for Civil Liberties, which was the predecessor to campaign group Liberty.

The facts remain that PIE was granted affiliated status before Harman, Dromey and Hewitt's watch, afterwards however they may not have known (as unlikely as it seems) about PIE's agenda, indeed, the NCCL described PIE – granted formal ‘affiliate’ status from 1975 to the mid-Eighties – in glowing terms as ‘a campaigning/counselling group for adults attracted to children’. Yet nothing was done and no, despite Harman's claims there weren't thousands of affiliates either.
If anything what the NCCL did was typical of many left wing groups looking for votes under any circumstances by allying themselves to the most odious of people or causes, you can see it today with their slavish support of Islam despite Islam's misogyny, homophobia and xenophobia towards anything other than Islam which has meant the left dropping like a stone their previous support of gay and Women's rights in their scramble to make new friends and use them.
Should Harman and the others apologise?
Well the current chairman of Liberty who developed out of the NCCL has apologised for past links and as Harman and co were enablers to a certain extent of PIE's status in the NCCL then perhaps yes they should. But they also know the price of an apology, apologies means the mud has stuck and it would be difficult for Harman to ressurect her career if she did apologise.
So expect a lot more weasel words before anything concrete happens.

Couldn't happen to a nicer chap or party

The ongoing Rennard scandal with the Lib Dems is making me chuckle a bit as I don't really have much time for that bunch of opportunists since the days of Paddy Pantsdown. That Rennard is accused of being a sexual predator of a minor type (no accusations so far of bedding) is a given, that he knows where the bodies are buried within the Lib Dem structure was a bit of a surprise, but on the whole not that big a surprise...
Mail.

Nick Clegg was last night warned by allies of Lord Rennard he faces a legal ‘bloodbath’ that will rip his party apart.
The peer has instructed a senior QC and plans to seek an injunction unless Mr Clegg halts an inquiry into the charge that he has brought the Lib Dems into disrepute by refusing to apologise over sex pest claims.
Lord Steel last night raised the stakes by saying the threat of expulsion should be withdrawn from Lord Rennard.

Ah the joys of expediency over common decency. You'd have thought that given the seriousness of the charges against Rennard that at least he'd be suspended pending an enquiry, though this is politics we're talking about here and usually not even an arrest is enough to stir the power brokers. Nor despite the claims that it was just a bit of leg touching does it seem to be so trivial, but until all the facts come out we don't know, but I rather suspect that the guy is a bit of a serial groper and has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar despite his high standing in the Lib Dem hierarchy and this has come back to haunt them big time due to their rank hypocrisy when it comes to politics, they are not the genial lentil eating sandal wearers of media myth, they are as cynical and duplicitous at grass roots level as they come, changing official policy on the hoof from door to door depending on the views of those they speak too.
With a bit of luck this scandal will be the final nail in their collective coffin, although their propensity to survive has taken them past the scandals of Thorpe, Oaten, Pantsdown, Huhne, Smith and into power with the Coagulation.
Still, we can hope...

Imagine the situation reversed

Can you imagine the outcry if employers deliberately targeted union activists and their families during an industrial dispute? Imagine that they sent 'heavies' to union leaders homes and tried to humiliate them in front of their families.That wanted posters with pictures of the union reps were posted through doors and were seen by the union reps kids.
Yet Unite the union has representatives who believe they have the right to do such a thing to management...
Mail.

The full extent of the Unite union’s campaign of bullying and intimidation against senior managers during the bitter Grangemouth oil refinery dispute is revealed today.
In a disturbing echo of the union militancy of the 1970s and 80s, Unite leaders deployed a dirty tricks squad to personally target and humiliate executives of the Ineos chemical company and their families.
The sinister unit – known as the ‘Leverage team’ – sent mobs of protesters to the homes of senior figures in the firm.
One director last night said he had feared for the safety of his wife and his two young children after 30 Unite protesters descended on his drive during the school holidays.
Police were called after the group approached his neighbours, telling them he was ‘evil’ in an apparent attempt to coerce him into giving in to their demands.
The daughter of another company boss had ‘Wanted’ posters denouncing her father posted through her front door hundreds of miles away in Hampshire.
The union agreed to call off the Leverage team only as part of the settlement of the dispute.
Yesterday, an unrepentant Unite spokesman said such activities were ‘legitimate in the context of an industrial dispute’, adding that ‘bad employers should have nowhere to hide’.

Yes, to the left this is a legitimate form of protest, similar to the Union of All Fascists (UAF) tactics against the EDL and other patriot groups and  used by various other leftard fanatics who see nothing wrong with violence and intimidation unless of course it's aimed at them.
The Union reps see nothing wrong with targeting individuals in ther disputes, yet would scream to high bloody heaven if management did the same to them.
Hypocrisy and the left are of course close bedfellows, the left has a history of doing and siding with all sorts of odious regimes and fanatics and frequently justifies violence by claiming that its all for the people, despite the fact that the left do not and never have really represented the people, merely themselves. Even at the beginning of WW2 the left because Hitler was at the time allied with Stalin tried to disrupt the war effort. Despite the known evils of the Soviet Union leftist after leftist visited and praised the peoples paradise of the Communist Block, even today the hypocrites still praise Cuba despite its locking up of dissenters.
It's about time that those on the left were viewed pretty much in the same way that Nazi's are, certainly the death toll in their regimes dwarfs that of the Nazis. Even the epithet 'fascist' a favourite of the left merely describes another authoritarian leftist system of government.
The union activists who did this thing should have been arrested under the 1994 public order act, that they weren't will merely give them the green light to attempt to intimidate by threatening families again.
But such is the left...

People will sign anything.

Female Genital Mutilation is a barbarous act, it's not circumcision (something I'm ambivalent about) the clue is in the word 'mutilation' by which the clitoris of a young girl is removed to stop her enjoying sex and hence less likely to want another man. Whilst the practice is often carried out by islamobarbarians, it isn't only that group which carries it out, there are African tribes of various religions involved too.
It however sadly came as no surprise to me when an anti FGM campaigner brought out a fake survey for people to sign and within a short time 19 out of twenty people had signed it agreeing that FGM is a good thing despite the anti-FGM campaigner mentioning the word mutilation when asking them to sign.
Mail.

A female genital mutilation (FGM) campaigner was left in tears after an experiment intended to assess the impact of political correctness on the fight against cutting saw 19 people sign a fake pro-FGM petition within 30 minutes.
Leyla Hussein, 32, who suffered female genital mutilation as a child, approached shoppers in Northampton with the petition, which argued that as FGM was part of her culture, it should be protected.
During the 30-minute experiment, 19 people signed the petition and just one refused - a result Hussein blamed on the all-pervading culture of political correctness.
According to a recent study by UNICEF, as many as 30 million girls are at risk of being subjected to FGM within the next decade, in the UK an estimated 66,000 women are believed to have undergone the process and 24,000 girls are considered at risk.

Guess how many people in the UK who have been arrested for allowing this to happen to their daughters? The answer is the same as the number of fingers on your nose.
This is a barbarous crime and yet people blithely signed a pro FGM petition because the campaigner believed that she was  not white and they didn't want to appear racist. Christ on a pogo stick have we sunk so low that people don't listen to what's being said but rather react to how people look?
This blog had long railed against political correctness, the dumbing down of education and the inherant racism of multiculturalism yet until today I hadn't realised just how far the people of this land have fallen
This is a direct result of the application of something akin to the GIGO principle of computer analysis, it stands for garbage in = garbage out (a fact used to death by the global warming cult) Goebbels called it the big lie as in tell someone loud enough and long enough that black is white, sooner or later they'll believe you and the indigenous people of the UK now appear to believe that it is racist to question what a person of another colour tells them.
It's days like this that I know we're doomed. 

Goosestepping into tyranny

The so called guardians of our society railroaded legislation through last night removing a key element to the justice system namely that of open trial.
Ignoring the utter scandal of the family courts which have been kidnapping children for a generation now, the authoritarian bastards in parliament appear to have taken that template as the basis for further removals of our liberties.
Mail.

Plans for secret courts were railroaded through the House of Commons last night despite angry opposition from all sides.
The move to hear cases judged to involve national security behind closed doors saw ministers accused of sacrificing British values and traditions.
Senior Conservatives – including Treasury committee chairman Andrew Tyrie and former leadership contender David Davis – led protests in last night’s debate of the final stages of the Justice and Security Bill.
Cabinet veteran Kenneth Clarke admitted he did not know how many closed hearings would be ordered under the legislation he has championed.
Mr Tyrie warned the Government was undermining ‘legal safeguards which we’ve had for generations’, adding: ‘These amendments may look technical but they are really about the kind of society we want to live in.
‘They are about whether people can get to hear the case that has been made against them… and above all they are about what values we are seeking as a country to espouse and export.’
Mr Davis suggested at least 15 cases a year would be held in secret, warning: ‘We have to live up to standards of accountability. That means open justice.’

You can pretty much guess as to what might be considered national security, though as for hearing about any trials involving it, well the bastards have made sure that you never will know. it means you may not even appeal to the public for support as that would be contempt of court.
Judgement should be open to scrutiny, you may not like the way a case has been presented, you may believe an injustice has been done, but at least you'll know and can protest. Now in certain trials you never will, people may end up in prison and no one will know why outside a small group, even then they won't be able to appeal for further witnesses as that would be contempt too.
This bill should never have been passed and all credit to those who tried to stop it. as for the rest, well I do hope that you'll get yours one day you utter bastards. But rest assured it won't be in a secret trial, I'd want the world to know exactly what you were and what you did.

Hitting a nerve somewhere

You can normally tell when a minor political party is starting to hit a nerve when smear stories start to come out in the MSM about the activities (true or otherwise) about its leadership whilst ignoring pretty much the endemic corruption of the mainstream parties. And so we have a hatchet job by the mail on Nigel Farage...
Mail.

So, Mr Farage, why does UKIP's leader have a German wife? ...and did she make you kip in the spare room over that 'seven-times-a night fling' with a Latvian?

First mistake is of course assuming that UKIP being anti-EU is actually anti-European, it's often the first mistake deliberate or otherwise that the EUphiles fall into as well. I suspect most people who support UKIP rather like Europeans, but cannot stand the government they've allowed to happen which overrules our laws and rights and believes it can do no wrong.

A lot of people don't seem to like UKIP ­ leader Nigel Farage. They roll their eyes and dismiss him as brash and vulgar - part used-car dealer, part public-school fool, 'utterly unembarrassable' and 'a poor man's Boris Johnson'.
They mutter about the BNP, a supposed tryst with a very passionate Latvian lady and the £2 million of EU expenses that he claimed over ten years 'to prove a point'.
They do, however, all know who he is. Because, love him or loathe him, he's impossible to ignore - blasting the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, as having 'the charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk'; dismissing Robert Kilroy-Silk as a 'vain, orange buffoon and a monster'; camping it up on TV's Have I Got News For You; or dangling upside down from the wreckage of a light aircraft in the middle of an election campaign, UKIP rosette still flapping.

Well the so called intelligentsia of the political classes must really have a burr up their arse if this is how they are going to play the game, not that I suspect Farage gives a damn. It's a pretty much predictable hatchet job by the left leaning political classes who don't like the idea that the people of the UK might just vote for something they hate in an exit from the EU and an end to mainstream party politics in the UK leaving them adrift from the levers of power for the first time in nearly sixty five years. So I suspect that the Tories are in somewhat of a funk over Farage, as they see him as the guy leading a party who will take votes away from them at the next election and let Labour in. Not that I think Labour particularly like him or his party either as they've shown that if the circumstances are right then UKIP can take Labour votes too. As for the Lib Dems, well they're still coming to terms with actually getting the blame for what the government does and seem likely to struggle in the next general election as they are now seen as 'establishment' and UKIP as the protest vote.
I expect we'll see a lot of this sort of thing over the next couple of years as we head towards elections, UKIP are on a roll, though whether or not they'll actually get any politicians into Westminster is debatable. Still it's nice to see the establishment rattled for once.

The Saville cover up

Oddly enough not about Jimmy Saville or the ensuing damage limitation enquiries into what was going on in the years when he was apparently active in abusing kids along with several so far unnamed others (Trawl the internet if you want names but as several are still living and I like blogging here, I can't for legal reasons name them)
Whilst the MSM have gone into overdrive over these allegations you can almost see the political calculations going on in the background and it's become a good month to bury bad news, or at least put other items to sleep in small columns in the centre of the papers rather than on the front page. Not that many in the blogging world are fooled, or indeed those active on political and various pressure group debate forums, but sadly we're very much in a minority. As far as the general public are concerned, all they want to read about is Saville, or before that it was the absconded schoolgirl. And whilst the effects of the Saville cases are widespread and may have caused some harm, he was only one man and there's far worse out there that really needs to be looked at, such as the scandal of the 'Family Courts' mostly ignored by the media due to reporting restriction though championed by Christopher Booker against a tide of deliberate resistance by those in authority to cease and desist along with tell all as to why it's really going on.
Also pushed off the front page is the ongoing Muslim grooming scandal which is now reaching almost epic proportions as police are now investigation over 10,000 cases of suspected abuse around the country, compared to the Saville 100. Horrifying as that is, in South Yorkshire a hot spot for many of the allegations there has not been one successful prosecution for child sex exploitation, only one in 2010 and eight in 2008. Yet the police and authorities have known for decades that this was going on and wrote off these young girls in an effort to appease community cohesion. South Yorkshire Police had even denied any suggestion they had been reluctant to tackle child sexual abuse and pointed to a series of successful criminal convictions. Yet a confidential 2010 police report exposed by The Times warned that thousands of such crimes were committed in South Yorkshire each year.
There are plenty of other stories buried under the mass of MSN speculation too, I'm sure you could make a fairly lengthy list.
I've believed ever since the Saville case hit the headlines (and I've known about the rumours for years) that this was a deliberate attempt by the powers that be to remove or deflect something from the public glare. I'm pretty sure that a cover up is going on and only a dead man will be named and shamed, others are digging assiduously though and hopefully the truth will out as it did in Belgium of the child sex scandal there.
That said, exposure of the scandal changed nothing, I'd expect as much here, the public are being prepared well in advance and the fix is in...

Not the real enemy

The EDL will be turning out in Luton this coming weekend, it's a celebration of 3 years of the organisation coming into being. 3 years in which the spotlight has been turned upon Islam in the UK, the previous and current governments policy of ruinous uncontrolled immigration and the growth of home grown terrorism within the UK.
Naturally there are those who would choose to bury their heads in the sand, or simply oppose the EDL because of who they perceive them to be, mostly on the left of the political spectrum as they do not like opposition that they don't or can't control.
Luton Today.

SPEAKERS at a meeting last night called for people in Luton to come together and oppose the ‘Islamophobia’ of the English Defence League, who are holding a protest rally in Luton on May 5.
The EDL have been told by Bedfordshire Police that they can hold their rally in Park Street, while coalition group ‘We Are Luton’ are being allowed to protest in Wardown Park.
‘We Are Luton’ is made up of different groups, including trade unions, Unite Against Fascism (UAF), the Green Party and the Luton Council of Mosques.
A UAF-produced poster displayed at last night’s meeting showed a picture of EDL leader Stephen Lennon, also known as Tommy Robinson, alongside a photo of Norwegian killer Anders Breivik, with the slogan, ‘Different Faces, Same Hatred’.
Labour councillor Sian Timoney told the meeting: “Last time, people told the EDL, ‘Sod off, we don’t want you here.’ That is the message we need to give them again this time.
“This town is proud of its diversity.
“There were comments last time saying the UAF are as bad as the EDL, that they just want a fight. Emotions run high and I would urge everyone to have a calm and peaceful protest.”

 The last statement is somewhat hysterical considering that in the picture top left is Wayman Bennett one of the UAF thugs responsible for most of the violence at EDL demo's.
There's also the usual attempt to link Anders Breivik to the EDL despite their being no evidence other than a possible intro on the EDL forum by someone using a name Breivik is supposed to have used, this being despite the fact that anyone can join the EDL forum which is a focal point for discussion and not the EDL itself.
However the real enemy despite the claims of the committee are those of the Islamic faith living in Luton.
Express.

FOUR suspected terrorists accused of plotting an attack in Britain were yesterday sent to the Old Bailey.
Zahid Iqbal, 30, Mohammed Sharfaraz Ahmed, 24, Syed Hussain 21, and Umar Arshad, 23, were remanded in custody at London’s Westminster Magistrates Court until May 11.
They had been arrested at their homes in Luton last week.
Before the hearing, prosecutor Piers Arnold said: “It is alleged the men committed acts of terrorism, or assisted others to commit acts.”
Mr Arnold, of the Counter Terrorism Division of the Crown Prosecution Service, added: “The alleged conduct included planning travel overseas, organising training, purchasing survival equipment and supplying funds for terrorist purposes.”

The EDL have never plotted to kill anyone and have never provided funds for terrorists,they have even refused to allow association to the EDL of groups known to support terrorism. yet you wont see a committee in Luton come together to deal with the real problem in their midst, they'd rather target the patriots of the EDL for highlighting the situation in the first place.
Luton and the various organisations making up ‘We Are Luton’ should really be concentrating on cleaning up their own house though judging by the picture they already have two of the enemy within anyway.
‘We Are Luton’ should be ashamed of the fact that they are being manipulated into defending a terrorist supporting religion whose tentacles run deep within its community. That they can't see this is to their eternal shame, that they have allied themselves to the vile UAF who support violence against ordinary patriots and have demonstrated in support of Islamic paedophilic grooming gangs in various cities in the country simply shows them to be either depraved or incredibly naive.
Still, what else can you expect from the organised left.

Suppression

We all know the MSM and the leftist National Union of Journalists suppress certain articles or alters them for the publics perception to fall generally in line with left = good, right = bad. Which is why when you know how to read media "code" you know that to tag right wing onto anything is to imply racism, fascism, or just plain evil in a way that to tag anything as left wing does not impute the amorality, greed, envy, corruption, evil and plain stupidity that that particular doctrine promotes as a matter of course. Which isn't to say that all left wingers are evil, simply that those who rise to the heights in the "left" (basically those on the extreme left as normal people really can't afford the time to do so having real lives) are generally corrupt mendacious control freaks and pretty much the mirror image of the authoritarian "right" those who would seek to control the general mass of humanity for their own selfish ends.
Still it's always interesting when someone in the media blurts out a home truth as opposed to the official line, which is what former Daily Star journalist Richard Peppitt did during the Leveson enquiry into press standards and ethics, which is currently being held in the High Court in London. ...


Seems the Daily Star deliberately suppressed information by which support for the EDL could be gauged with over 2,000 calls to an online survey (they usually only get 10) and 99% in favour of the EDL's (unstated) policies and this was deliberately suppressed by the MSM and the NUJ
As far as I'm aware other than the recent Demos survey (downloadable here), there has never really been any attempt to try and estimate just what level of public support an organisation like the EDL might have or just who or what their membership such as it is contains, even the Daily Stars heavily edited response to the poll was attacked from every angle.
No, I'm not suggesting that the EDL has 99% public support, but and it's a big but, there seems to be an active collusion in the MSM and government to cover up what level of support it has, along with increasing vilification in the press over its activities as well as attacks by the police when they weren't doing anything unlawful along with attempts to ruin its leaders business and wreck his and his families life.
The EDL are only one of a number of such groups who seem to have their activities misrepresented in the MSM by the NUJ and their infamous and insidious "guidelines" in which they seek to suppress the truth and the feelings of the general public to the previous governments attempts to rub the rights face in multiculturalism.

H/T Vlad Tepes blog for the find.

Dead stable

Cameron came out with a corker today, he told BBC political editor Nick Robinson there were "serious clouds on the horizon" and it was "absolutely vital" to stabilise the Euro. Vital to whom he doesn't seem to be quite so clear about, after all the UK is not part of the Eurozone and if the Euro does go tits up to coin the vernacular it certainly wont affect the UK as badly as those countries who are a part of it. If anything it's hurting us now with all the attempts to save it by cash grabs from the EU in desperate attempts to stave off the inevitable.
BBC.

David Cameron has said the world economy is at "a moment of danger" as a result of the eurozone crisis.

He told BBC political editor Nick Robinson there were "serious clouds on the horizon" and it was "absolutely vital" to stabilise the euro.

After that was done, he said, there must be "more on the growth front" in the UK to get the economy moving.

The PM also said safeguards were needed to protect UK interests if Eurozone states begin closer integration.

Well at least he didn't try to blame it on America like the last PM did, however Cameron is in the position of a kid standing beside a badly wounded parent and unable to control the events going on around him helpless but to scream don't let them die please to the people around him. The Euro is dead, I know it, you know it, the financiers know it.

So why Cameron is trying to tell us that it still can (or must) be saved is somewhat of a mystery to all, even his own party, though perhaps not the Lib Dem leader whose pension depends on the EU surviving and the UK remaining part of it.
The best way to stabilise the Euro from my admittedly jaundiced perspective would be to let it die without spending any more UK taxpayers money on it, after all, dead is stable and Cameron wants stability.
I suspect it wont happen that easily though, there are vested interests involved after all, I even suspect when the whole rotten edifice falls we'll have politicians popping up to tell us mistakes were made and lessons learned so trust us to try again.
Thing is though, I don't trust politicians anymore, the people I mix with are equally as jaded and will not vote or if they do will no longer vote mainstream. If this collapses (and it will) you can expect the rise of more extremist parties offering "solutions" to the problem, likely involving immigrants or a convenient scapegoat. Europe has form for this sort of thing after all, Hitler and the Nazi's didn't just come from nowhere or were a total aberration in European history.
So best we stay out of it, let it die and look after our own.
But that's not Cameron's way, he seems to want to drag us screaming down into the long night.

Pandering

This is what multiculturalism ends up as.
This is what diversity will get you.
This is what happens when you go soft on minorities because of the above.
This is what lowering standards to get minorities into positions of authority (aka tokenism) brings you.
This is what failure to assure excellence in our education system has brought us too.
This is the price we now have to pay for the failure of the political classes, socialists and the MSM to listen to the concerns of the ordinary people of England.
Our cities burn, minorities riot, the followers of a foreign and malignant fascistic political system dressed in the trappings of a religion have been allowed to settle in numbers in some of our cities and demand their own laws. The indigenous population have been derided by politicians as being bigoted to even question it. When they marched in protest they were called Nazi's, scum, vermin, knuckle draggers, right wing and racist, yet it was not they who rioted.
And when the dust settles, the cover up will begin, those who burned our cities and attacked our police and ordinary folk will claim victim status yet again, it's already happening on the BBC as excuse after excuse is trotted out about cuts and police brutality by so called community leaders.The usual soundbite fools like Ken Livingstone are being dragged out too to try and put a political slant on the mindless looting by trying to blame the current government for a mess of the previous governments making.
There have even been attempts by some on the left to draw parallels with violence exhibited at EDL protests in an effort to divert blame or ameliorate the situation, save only the EDL have never burnt buses, set fire to buildings, looted shops, attacked homeowners and robbed them. These were the same people who hunted desperately for any kind of link between Anders Brievik and the EDL even to the extent of inventing a few.
This is what happens when those in power and their accomplices simply don't listen to ordinary people.

How to win friends and influence people....not

There are a few things that get peoples blood boiling, Israel/Palestine, left/right, toilet seat up/down and of course boundary disputes. Nothing quite like setting neighbours at loggerheads than one supposedly discovering that the boundary fence may be in the wrong place or even a tree branch is over their property. Few however have the nerve of Donald Trump.

Telegraph.

Donald Trump angers neighbour after erecting new boundary fence and then billing him
Their David and Goliath dispute over a proposed £1 billion golf course has raged for several years.

But Donald Trump has infuriated one of his Scottish neighbours and longtime foes once again by erecting a fence around his house and then billing him for it.
David Milne, 46, found himself at loggerheads with the tycoon when he refused to sell his home to the Trump Organisation.
The couple are among five home owners who live on the Menie Estate in Balmedie, Aberdeenshire, where Trump is in the process of building the "best golf course in the world".
They fear they could be evicted as Trump looks to secure more land.
In the latest twist to the saga, Mr Milne has disclosed that the American billionaire recently decided that the boundaries which separated their land were incorrect and instructed his team to erect a fence without any warning. 

He then sent Mr Milne an invoice of £2,820 – half of the total bill of £5,640.

The health and safety adviser said Trump's demand was "ridiculous" and that he would not pay a penny towards the fence.

He said: "I'm just ignoring the demand. There is no way I'm going to pay it.

Now I don't understand the rights and wrongs of the actual dispute itself, though I do believe that it's a long running thing and that the SNP are involved in the process somewhere. The lovely Subrosa has a better view of what's going on up there than I do.

My take is on the sheer nerve of arbitrarily deciding that the land boundaries were wrong and building a new fence on what you believe to be the new boundary and then having the nerve to charge your neighbour whom you haven't consulted half of the costs! 

Land boundary disputes usually involve a visit to the H M Land Registry in England and Wales at least and if the dispute can't be resolved amicably by mediation then go to the courts. Now Donald Trump or whoever decided that the boundaries were wrong  is well within their rights to erect new fencing along the boundary, there are a few stipulations in that the uprights all have to be on your side of the boundary and no higher than 1 metre next to a public highway or 2 metres elsewhere, but what you don't get to do is charge your neighbour for erecting your fence, even if it's a shared boundary.

I suspect this is intimidation and it doesn't exactly make Trump look too good, but from previous stuff he's got up too, I suspect he doesn't care, he has lawyers for that sort of thing.

As I said previously, I don't know the rights and wrongs of what's going on, but I know where my sympathies lie now, Donald Trump has made sure of that.

One down several hundred to go

Another peer was jailed today for robbing us, though the official version reads falsely claiming £11,277 in parliamentary expenses. Still robbing us who pay tax though, not that the pigs who do this seem to feel any sort of shame over it.

BBC.

Former Conservative peer Lord Taylor of Warwick has been jailed for 12 months for falsely claiming £11,277 in parliamentary expenses.

He claimed for travel between a home he used in Oxford and Westminster, as well for overnight stays in London.

The 58-year-old said he had made the false claims "in lieu of a salary", and had been acting on colleagues' advice.

Jailing him, judge Mr Justice Saunders said the expenses scandal had "left an indelible stain on Parliament".

Taylor, who was Britain's first black Conservative peer and a former barrister and radio and TV presenter, listed his main residence as a home in Oxford, which was owned by his nephew, while he actually lived in a flat in Ealing, west London.

He pleaded not guilty to the charges - saying had been told by senior peers it was normal practice to make false expenses claims - but was convicted in January.

Normal practice, that seems to just about sum it up doesn't it? It's normal practice for these people to steal from those who pay taxation. Well it's not normal practice to steal from your employer in just about any other career or vocation I know of, so I don't know what makes these guys think they're the exception. I really don't know what it as that changes politicians, perhaps it's just the overall corruption of the system or the power trip that they get from lording it over what they seem to see as lesser mortals. It's just the sheer arrogance of them that is slowly moving the public view of politicians so somewhere way below the usual scum of the Earth normally reserved for them and journalists.
Politicians have probably done their vocation irreparable damage over the last 50 years as they've taken advantage of their position to milk the system whilst handing over huge chunks of our sovereignty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels aided and abetted by a treasonous cabal in the higher echelons of the civil service.
I often say in jest that we should hang them all and start from scratch, but it's not funny any more.

It may be the law, but it isn't justice

It didn't really make anything but a footnote in the various MSM outlets, but justice for Amy Houston failed on Thursday. Amy was the young girl who was killed by Aso Mohammed Ibrahim, 33, an Iraqi Kurd and a failed asylum seeker who was already banned from driving, who left Amy Houston dying under the wheels of his car in Blackburn in 2003.

Sky.

A bid to deport failed asylum seeker Aso Mohammed Ibrahim, who killed a 12-year-old girl in a hit-and-run in Lancashire, has been rejected.

Ibrahim, a 33-year-old Iraqi Kurd, had already been banned from driving when he left Amy Houston dying under the wheels of his car in Blackburn in 2003.

He was jailed for four months over the death but on his release was allowed to remain in the UK

Ibrahim had faced deportation as an illegal immigrant but was allowed to remain after an immigration judge ruled in 2009 that he had established a "family life" in the UK.

Amy's father Paul had campaigned for years to get Ibrahim deported.

The Court of Appeal judges expressed their "greatest sympathy" for Amy's family but said their only task was to decide whether there had been any error of law.

After the judgement was given, Mr Houston, who was in the public gallery, addressed the bench saying: "What about my right to a family life?"

There is some debate going on currently as to whether or not Ibrahim is married or that the children are his and he's simply using this as an excuse to stay in the UK. But whether true or not it's plain to me that there has been a gross miscarriage of justice here, oh certainly with Ibrahim the law was upheld and his human rights were not breached, though again what of Amy Houston's rights and those of her father to see justice done? 4 months in prison hardly strikes me as just and as for being allowed to stay here after he had failed to be granted asylum status...
Oh yes I'm sure they took the rights of his new family to have a "man" in their life into account, but my sympathy for them is by far outweighed by my disgust at his actions, nothing stopping them from going back to Iraq with him after all if they need him so much.
As the father said we have a system that protects the criminal.
This killer is free to live in this country despite his criminal past, but meanwhile the family of the girl are "sentenced" to live the rest of their lives in mourning, a judgement made on a legal point, NOT common sense.

Justifying paedophilia

There is a problem in the Pakistani Muslim community and it isn't just that they are Muslims. For years now the some of the young men in that community have been preying on and grooming under age girls from outside their community, not just white, but Sikh and Hindu girls as well. Finally the MSM had the courage to break the story and various other minions of the state poked their heads above the parapet to tell us yes they knew about it, but dared not report it further because it might be deemed "racist" if they did. So you'd think the Muslim community as a whole would be keeping their heads down and coming out with various platitudes such as "it's only a minority" and doing their best to use the term "Asian" rather than "Muslim" or "Pakistani" like most of their useful idiots on the left and in the MSM have been doing, though the Muslim talent for public relations and how to get it totally wrong is utterly astounding.
So, into the breach steps Lord Ahmed of Cartexting Rotherham to explain why these scum behaved as they did and it's all due to marrying their cousins (even the ones who weren't married it seems)

Express.

BRITAIN'S first Muslim peer last night attacked arranged first-cousin marriages for contributing to a spate of sex crimes committed by Pakistani men.

Lord Ahmed of Rotherham said the marriages were being used by depraved young men as an excuse to prey on “vulnerable girls”.

His comments follow a succession of court cases where Asian men have been prosecuted for targeting white teenage girls.

The Labour peer, who wants an end to cousin marriages, claimed Asian men target their victims at a young age because they feel there is less chance of getting caught.

He said: “They are married to girls from overseas who they don’t have anything in common with and they have children and a family but they are looking for fun in their sexual activities and seek out vulnerable girls.”

Last month, former Home Secretary Jack Straw provoked fury after claiming some men of Pakistani origin view white girls as “easy meat”.

The Labour MP for Blackburn spoke out after two Asian men who abused girls in Derby were given indeterminate jail terms.

Research suggests about 55 per cent of British Pakistanis marry their first cousins, who are typically from abroad.

Marriages between first cousins is lawful in Britain, but they are generally frowned upon.

So there you go, marrying your cousin turns you into a sex mad paedophile according at least to Lord Ahmed. The truth is rather more brutal of course, these men behaved in a depraved manner because people in authority and in their own communities chose to look the other way. Yes some of the blame must also be laid at the feet of the parents of these children too, though in some instances at least they may not have been aware of what was going on, or even cared. But the vast majority of the blame has to be laid at the feet of these men who deliberately sought to target vulnerable children from other communities because they knew full well what would happen if they did target their own. There is no justification in the world for what they did, nor any excuse and Lord Ahmed would have done well to have simply continued his campaign to end first cousin marriages without trying to excuse or justify these perverts behaviour.
I am sick to death of this stupid blame game played out in the MSM and our political elite over the rape and prostitution of these young girls. I'm sick to death of the avoidance of the discussion of the amount of men queuing up to pay to molest these children, some in their 50's following the example of their sick prophet no doubt, after all if it was good enough for Mohammed... And well past the age where they're over the distress of being forced into marriage if they ever were. I'm sick to death of the term Asian being used to disguise the fact that this is a Pakistani Muslim problem. It's not a Sikh problem, it's not a Hindu problem it most certainly isn't a Chinese problem and they are all Asians and sick to death no doubt about being tarred with a Pakistani Muslim perversion. I'm sick to death of people like Taji Mustafa, media spokesperson of Hizb ut-Tahrir who objects to the claims that Islam had anything to do with the issue as various newspapers had claimed. He said:

"Islam promotes respect for women regardless of their race, religion and ethnicity. In Islam, you are not allowed to drink, take drugs, engage in pre-marital sex or even have a girlfriend. So how can Islam be blamed for these heinous crimes?"

 I suspect the fact that it was Muslims doing this that gives the game away, not Asians but Pakistani Muslims, despite the vast generalisation on the matter of who was actually doing it in the press and amongst politicians as well as the silence of various socialist groups like the SWP and the UAF who would be all over this if it was white guys preying on Muslim girls screaming racist no doubt. Since 1997, 56 people with an average age of 28 have been convicted of offences related to on-street grooming of girls aged 11 to 16. Of these, three were white and the rest Asian, of whom 50 were Muslim, with the majority British Pakistani, with more and more cases coming out of the woodwork. I'm totally sick of the stench of cover up as this seems to have been going on for years, even the fact that at the time the UK's youngest mum was only a mum because she was gang raped by Pakistani taxi drivers back in 2002 and still nothing was done other than for Labour to open the floodgates to even more immigration to rub the rights nose in multiculturalism. Well if this is one of the benefits of multiculturalism then count me out as a fan of it, not that I ever was, watching from the sidelines as all that was good about England was denigrated and contemptuously cast aside by Labour, the left and their pro British anti English mind set, which allowed this outrage to go on unchallenged until it could no longer be brushed under the mat and even then I reckon it would still be hidden and Jack Straw et al saying nothing and pretending the problem doesn't exist had not the Times finally got brave enough to do an article on it. I even remember Nick Griffin of the BNP being vilified  and prosecuted back in 2005 for saying it was going on. Since then the establishments, both legal and political, have ignored the continuing abuse and violence solely for their own benefit and to avoid getting accused of racism themselves. 

I am absolutely horrified by this, authorities across the country knew this was going on for many years yet did NOTHING significant to effect the cessation of these vile acts, but elected instead to hide them under blankets of secrecy! They were culpable in withholding relevant information that would have helped to protect our country's children from abuse at the hands of Muslim paedophile gangs.

What gets me as well, is that as soon as these scum have done their time they'll vanish back into their communities and not be despised like we would despise.

That this could happen in my England is the most damning verdict on the Labour years in power, not the war in Iraq, not the financial waste and irregularities, but the despoliation of young girls by an alien culture encouraged to settle here and aided and abetted by a wall of silence by the authorities.

Having our noses rubbed in diversity

Jack (I hate the English) Straw has deigned to comment on the grooming of young English girls by Pakistani (Muslim) males.

Sky.

Former home secretary Jack Straw has claimed there is a problem with vulnerable white girls being targeted for sexual abuse by some Pakistani men.

The Blackburn MP talked of a "specific problem" involving Pakistani men and called on the community to be "more open" about the issue.

He spoke after two Asian men who subjected a series of vulnerable girls to rapes and sexual assaults were given indefinite jail terms.

You'll notice the use of Pakistani and Asian here, though I very much doubt Pakistani Christians or Hindu's and Sikhs are very happy with the catch all tags denigrating their ancestry.
This "specific problem" is a direct result of new Labours multicultural meddling in trying to rub the "Right's" noses in diversity. The game was given away by Andrew Neather a former Labour government minister, but totally exposed when the Home office papers were released later on.
The Judges comment was also startling...

The judge said he did not believe Saddique and Liaqat's crimes were "racially aggravated", but Mr Straw said he thought vulnerable white girls were at risk of being targeted by some Asian men.

"They're fizzing and popping with testosterone, they want some outlet for that, but Pakistani-heritage girls are off limits and they are expected to marry a Pakistani girl from Pakistan, typically," he said.

"So they then seek other avenues and they see these young women, white girls who are vulnerable, some of them in care... who they think are easy meat."

So it's perfectly acceptable "culturally" in their eyes to do this? What kind of culture permits the targeting of women from other cultures to be groomed, raped and prostituted? Could it be the same culture that has a gang raped woman who became pregnant by the rapist's given 100 lashes for adultery and sentenced to a year in prison too? Well it is if you define adherents of a certain religion as a culture.

You see Labour have brought in from various places a culture which has serious issues with Western freedom and secularism. One which does not see anything wrong with committing all sorts of abuses so long as it's not done to one of their own.
There's the usual "righteous" attempt to divert the blame though...

His comments have been attacked by fellow Labour colleague Keith Vaz - who said it was wrong to "stereotype a whole community".

The Leicester East MP, who chairs the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, said he did not believe there was a "cultural problem" and called for a high-level investigation of such grooming across the UK.

No doubt in a massive effort to catch an English gang doing the same thing.
Vaz is of course wrong, there is a cultural problem if these males see women from outside their own culture as fair game for these crimes, after all where did they get the idea that it was ok if not from their own culture? They certainly didn't appear to mix with mine other than to commit crimes against it. Not that Vaz is to be trusted, it's my personal opinion that he's a typical politician and corrupt to the core.

The most damning thing about every article I've read on the subject is that they fail to mention the "M" or "I" words, after all, that's the culture behind the culture we're really talking about and have a problem with. Oh I'm not saying that all Pakistani male Muslims are a problem, but I am saying that the religious culture that treats women as cattle for popping out more males might just be an issue with the way they saw fit to do this to women which they would not be permitted at home or amongst their own.
Still at least the conspiracy of silence is being questioned. Though sadly not yet broken I fear.

Still I doubt this is quite what Labour meant by having our noses rubbed in diversity, though undoubtedly this is exactly what it is.

Doing a job properly

I take pride in my work, I try not to let my employer down and I abide by the necessary rules, regulations and laws that apply to various aspects of my job. The company monitor what I get up too, to a certain extent and there are policies in place to deal with any problems encountered whilst doing my job. Still, a lot of what I do is covered by trust, my manager can't be everywhere, but because of trust he knows that the job will get done to a satisfactory (at least) standard. However were I not to do the job properly and my actions lead to someone being killed or injured, I'd expect to get more than just a slap on the wrist. A possible prison sentence for criminal neglect could possibly be the least of my problems. I'd imagine that the same rules apply to other people in other jobs, right?

Wrong!

Telegraph.

A total of 15 nurses have been suspended for failing to improve standards at a hospital where as many as 1,200 patients died due to "appalling standards of care". 

But campaigners fear many more could have escaped censure, after a catalogue of failings at Stafford and Cannock Chase hospitals.

The nurses have all been suspended at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust in the last six months, the magazine Nursing Standard discovered. 

In March last year a report by the now-disbanded Healthcare Commission found that patients were left for hours in soiled bedclothes, while some were left without food and water, leaving a few reportedly to resort to drinking from nearby vases.
Attitudes of staff were at times "uncaring'' but managers were "in denial" of the problems, it concluded.
Sir Bruce Keogh, the medical director of the NHS, described the episode as a "gross and terrible breach of trust".
Julie Bailey, who runs Cure the NHS, which campaigns to improve nursing standards in the wake of the scandal, welcomed news of the suspensions.
"Eighteen months we have been battling for this, and it's only happened because we pushed the Nursing and Midwifery Council to do something about it," she said.
Ms Bailey, whose 86-year-old mother Bella died at Stafford Hospital in 2007, claimed there were more than 15 nurses who should be investigated.
The 15 were identified by combing through an independent inquiry chaired by Robert Francis, QC, she believed.
"It is just targeting a few nurses mentioned in the Robert Francis report," she said.
"We would like them to go through our 180 complaints, that we presented to [former health secretary] Andy Burnham, to identify individual members of staff for the abuse they caused to our relatives."
Mr Francis's report found 18 of the 22 board members who ran the trust over the period under investigation had left their roles.
Only one manager has been disciplined. Kate Levy, the board's head of legal services, was sacked for allegedly suppressing details of a misdiagnosis of a patient who died, John Moore-Robinson, 20. She plans to appeal.
Colin Ovington, the trust's director of nursing and midwifery, said it was unable to comment on why staff had been suspended for confidentiality reasons.
However, he said the "overall trend" of suspensions over the past six months was "slightly upwards". He said this was "further evidence that we are dealing quickly with any examples of poor care or unacceptable behaviour".

Seems like the healthcare industry allows you to get away with manslaughter through neglect with just a suspension. They are also using confidentiality as an excuse to cover their tracks as well though that's common enough excuse in any managerial situation where covering your own back is common enough to prevent an investigation of just exactly where you fitted into the situation. Not the first time this has happened in hospitals either, in my own neck of the woods the superbug scandal at Maidstone Hospital got a lot of headlines, but eventually those responsible didn't go to prison, some ended up with compensation payments in the crazy world of public health.
It would be nice to live in a country where cause and effect has direct consequences, but unfortunately all the rules, regulations both at local, national and international levels often give the guilty a get out of jail free card, complete with pass go and collect £200 compensation. Nor can I see any chance of the main 3 political parties sorting this out, they were responsible for many of the rules anyway and for abdicating responsibility to the EU when they weren't. It would be nice to think that anyone whose actions caused the death of someone through not doing their job properly would end up with more than a suspension, but that's the world the political classes seem to have created for us, still come the revolution...