Just words

The recent Ukip surge has politicians a bit rattled. Ukip stands for many things, but the main one is leaving the EU, however that's not the policy which has the main political parties worried. Ukip's anti immigration stance is the one where they believe they are going to have to act tough not quite realising that the second goes hand in hand with the first...
Mail.

The public has lost faith in government claims about tackling immigration because it does not tally with what they see on the ground, Nick Clegg will admit.
In a speech on immigration tomorrow, the Deputy Prime Minister will say it is ‘no wonder’ that people do not believe what ministers tell them when they have been ‘repeatedly told one thing only to then see another’.
He will speak out in favour of the free movement of European citizens but seek reforms to ensure that fewer Eastern Europeans move here if more countries are admitted to the EU in future.
Labour’s welfare spokesman Rachel Reeves will also call for reforms to the freedom of movement – to tackle benefit tourism – in a speech tomorrow.

Yes people have lost faith in the government mostly because we know they lie to us and unfortunately for the boy Clegg and Rachel Reeves they are lying to us about reforming the EU too as reform particularly on the free movement of labour (even if it is benefit tourism) is one of the cornerstones of EU policy and they aren't going to change it to suit us.
Nor is it EU immigration that really concerns people, it's immigration from islamic countries and the setting up of ghetto's of islamists who don't integrate, hate us and are just as big benefit leeches via their families who don't work and have severe medical problems due to generations of first cousin marital inbreeding.
The fact is, we've been pushed to the limits by mass uncontrolled immigration coupled with constantly being told that we have to be tolerant and tolerate the intolerable. We are the ones being called racist by the likes of the moronic left and their liberal fellow passengers. We are the ones who live next to the expanding ghetto's with their shariah law, intolerance, grooming gangs, homophobia, misogyny etc and we're told that we are the problem, not them!
What do people do when politicians and the political process fail them? They look to politicians proposing simple solutions. That usually means minor parties like Ukip, but it can also mean groups like the BNP too.
The next twenty or so years are not going to be fun in the UK, I just hope that the damage can be repaired in time. Either way, Clegg and Reeves aren't the solution, they and their parties are part of the problem.

Oh just f*#k off!

Some people simply do not get the concept of what we do with our money is our business. They get on their little pedestals to the MSN and tell us what we ought to do for reasons that mean nothing to the ones they are pontificating too. They simply do not grasp that our money is ours to spend as we want and their cause celebre is generally not something we believe in...
Telegraph.

Middle-class families should stop buying large fridges in order to save energy and tackle climate change, a government-commissioned report has suggested.
Families could save up to £36 a year on their electricity bills by replacing large fridge-freezers or televisions with smaller appliances, according to a study published by the Department for Energy and Climate Change.
The report found that the average family fridge had grown in volume by two fifths since 1985, amid a fashion for large American-style appliances, while the average television had grown by more than seven inches since 2004. It warned that the trend undermined attempts to cut carbon emissions.
The study, by researchers at Loughborough University and Cambridge Architectural Research, found that energy-efficient technology was not enough to offset the increase in the size of appliances. For example, a 52in television with an A+ energy rating still uses more electricity than a 42in model with an A rating.
Nicola Terry, a co-author of the study, said: “Why do we need a bigger TV, and why do we need a bigger fridge? I don’t understand the case, but when people go to the shop they think, that’s bigger it must be better.”

I've got news for you Mz Terry, bigger might not be better in the terms you're thinking of, but to a family a bigger tv is better, a bigger fridge freezer is better and they don't give a damn as to saving £36 a year when they know the governments green taxes are stealing £120+ from them via the energy companies.You see most people aren't interested in the energy rating per-se, they'll go by them when comparing like for like, but the energy rating is not what decides someone from 42" to 52" its the picture quality and whether it will fit through the front door and hang on the wall. In the case of the fridge its whether they can easily get the family shop in plus have room for treats rather than like my own fridge be stuffed full of beer for the weekend that I can't get my packed sandwiches easily in for Friday's shift.
Nor do people give a damn about carbon capture, they know its a scam, they know that the government via the environmental lobby are lying through their teeth anf they know that the Department for Energy and Climate Change are run by enviroloons who do not have their best interests at heart.
Finally why do people buy the biggest fridge or telly that they can afford?
The answers simple, because we can!

Sick

The Human Rights Act, one of the most odious pieces of legislation foisted upon us by the previous Labour government and naturally supported to the hilt by the Lib Dems as it's necessary to have it and remain in the EU. No one in a civilised society believes criminals should have no rights, but the HRA gives them exactly the same rights as a none criminal and this is where the trouble starts...
Express.

A SUDANESE rapist who preyed on girls as young as 13 is suing Justice Secretary Chris Grayling over “frustration and anxiety” caused by a delay to his parole hearing.
Adil Aboulkadir, 38, was jailed for a minimum of four years for his part in the abuse of three vulnerable girls.
He was said to have led a gang of five Darfur refugees who groomed victims aged 14 and 13 in Dartford, Kent.
Aboulkadir had already launched a series of taxpayer-funded ­legal actions which could cost Britain more than £250,000 and block moves to deport him for years.
Now he wants damages, saying his human rights were violated because he had to wait seven months for a court date to argue for his freedom.
Taxpayers paid £125,000 for a legally-aided lawyer and ­interpreter during the gang’s trial at Maidstone Crown Court in 2008. Aboulkadir was convicted of rape and sexual ­activity with a child. But he convinced the High Court that his rights were “arguably” violated by a failure to consider release immediately his minimum jail term ended.
He was freed 16 months ­after the four-year tariff expired. Since 2013 he has been in an immigration centre, fighting a bid to deport him.

I actually feel rather sick at having this monster in the same county as me...
Any sane system would have had him deported the second he left prison, any decent system would have had the child rapist take a bullet in the back of the head the moment he was found guilty of his rape jihad. But no, our system gives the monster a chance at milking the taxpayer because the system hurt his feelings by taking too long.
This man should never have been allowed into the UK, he should not have been allowed to remain, but the lunacy that is the HRA which the government won't remove so in love with the EU that it is gives this scum the chance to stay here and possibly be a risk to other children.
This is socialism in action, this is why the left should be regarded in the same light as Nazis, simply unable to be trusted with what's decent and right.
This guy needs hanging, as do his whole legal team and all the politicians who voted for and desire to keep the HRA on the statute books...

Soldier of allah my a**e

I did think that when the barbarians who butchered Lee Rigby were allowed to go on trial that they'd simply use it as an excuse to expound islam as it is, rather than islam as our idiot politicians and assorted leftards want us to believe islam to be.
Granted it makes them look like utter barbarians, but giving air time or MSM time to these people is also counter-productive as it only encourages the other buggers to come out of the woodwork.
Express.

A MAN accused of murdering Drummer Lee Rigby told a court today he does not regret what happened to the soldier, whom he admitted killing as part of a "military operation".
Michael Adebolajo, 28, told the Old Bailey that he would never regret obeying Allah.
The defendant also claimed he loves al Qaeda because they were his "brothers of Islam".
The defendant told the court that his defence to the alleged murder is because he is a soldier and it was a "military operation".
"I'm a soldier. I'm a soldier of Allah," the jury heard.

No uniform, no country, no conscience. This does not make him a soldier but an agent provocateur  and as such ought to be shot... or even better drowned in a vat of pigs blood. You see saboteurs, spies and other military clandestine groups are subject to different rules if caught not wearing uniforms. That's why we have different courts for our armed forces as civil courts simply cannot know or take into account the stresses they are under. But terrorists are not and never will be soldiers, the clue is in the 'terror' part of the description therefore different rules ought to apply. It's also why our idiot politicians and leftards don't get militant islam, becuase they simply do not understand the mindset of these barbarians and will often welcome them into our midst without realising that they actually believe they are at war with us.
No, these men aren't soldiers, they do not fight like soldiers nor do they behave like soldiers, they behave like muslims are supposed to in the quran. They are terrorists, murderers, rapists, looters, slavers and overthrowers of civilisations.
They do not belong amongst us, now or ever.
That they are allowed speaks more for the failure of our politicians not to recognise the threat, they'd rather target so called right wing groups and their supporters for pointing out the bleeding obvious.
I truly fear for our countries future if we continue to treat this menace with kid gloves.

Human wrongs

The Marxist ethos in the Human Rights System can cause all manner of problems in that it normally is used to allow the guilty to avoid the consequences of their actions. There are those out there who believe that even if scum have rights then so do the rest of us and can make a compelling case for such, however in most cases, only the bad get to make headlines...
However for the servants of the state, the rights of some can be over=ridden when they decide that a danger is posed, the current scandal with the family courts held in secret, sometimes even from those who are being judged by one is one of them, however there are also the actions of social workers and local councils to be considered too...
Mail.

Social services forcibly removed a pregnant woman's unborn baby by caesarean section and put it up for adoption after obtaining a high court order on the grounds the mother had suffered a mental breakdown.
Essex council obtained an order allowing them to sedate the woman against her will before taking her daughter and placing it into care.
The Italian woman, who was in Britain on a work training course, claims she had not even been warned that she would be given a caesarean. It is not believed a natural birth would have posed a risk to her or the child's health.
Social workers argue they were acting in the best interests of the baby, who is now 15 months old, and are refusing to hand her back to the mother despite claims that she has made a complete recovery,
The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, reportedly suffered a panic attack while staying at a hotel which her relatives believe was a result of her failing to take medication for a pre-existing bi-polar condition.
She called the police and was taken to a psychiatric hospital where she was sectioned under the mental health act.
The baby was born five weeks later after which the mother returned to Italy.
The case has since escalated into an international legal row with an Italian High Court judge questioning whether British care proceedings should have been applied to the child of an Italian citizen.

Now I'm pretty sure bi-polarism should not be grounds for removing a child from a parent unless they are refusing to take medication, I'm also pretty sure in this case that forcibly removing a child by caesarian breaches so many human rights that I'm amazed a High Court Judge even sanctioned it. after all, first the Council would first have to find that she was basically unfit to make any decision herself and then shown there was an acute risk to the mother if a natural birth was attempted.
Or rather I would be if this weren't the UK and the courts have been kidnapping children via the family courts and putting them up for adoption wholesale.
I do have a horrible suspicion that a caesarian was used to prevent any emotional bonding between mother and child as it's known the mother was rendered unconscious during the process, but that's simply my opinion.
In this case the power of social workers and the courts appears to be based not on facts, but on fear, misjudgement and abuse of power.
I hope the Lady gets her child back, but knowing how the system is played in this country, I'm not going to hold my breath.

Justice today

Let's face it, British justice is a joke, it's arbitrary, two tiered and has the oddest set of values where theft is regarded far less tolerable than violence. Nor has the Human Rights Act helped where the legal profession has brought itself into disrepute several times owing to cases brought and judgements made.
Still, this is a new low.
Mail.

In 2011, Lucy Walsh was abducted by three men after a night out
They raped her repeatedly, laughing when she cried out
Two were convicted and sentenced; police are looking for the third attacker
But the two successfully appealed and were given less prison time
And one of them was granted British citizenship while in jail
Fearful for her safety with an attacker still at large, Lucy has fled to Canada
Lucy Walsh woke up in a dimly lit, grubby room she didn't recognise. She quickly realised, to her horror, that she was naked, and that she was not alone.
A man was on top of her, pinning her to the floor, while another raped her. There were others there, too, talking in a foreign language, and laughing when she screamed in terror and pain. The 24-year-old was subjected to a horrific two-hour attack, as the men took it in turns to rape her.
But the repercussions for Lucy went far beyond the physical injuries she sustained that night. It would destroy her faith in her country and its legal system, which she'd always trusted to protect her, but which seemed to her to favour the rights of her attackers above hers.
Her ordeal was described by a judge as 'among the worst to have come before this court in recent years' - yet in a sick irony, one of her attackers was granted British citizenship as he awaited trial.

A case of rape jihad, where muslim males believe that any woman not a muslim is fair game (and some muslim women too who dress western style) However that is by the bye, I would be disgusted and outraged had the men been white Anglo-Saxons, though I have a sneaking suspicion that they at least would have been given a much tougher sentence and certainly would not have had their sentence reduced to a mere 12 years on appeal.
A true justice system would have had these men (though clearly they are not real men) castrated or hung for doing this, but as we only have custodial sentencing, then life would probably have been far too short, by life meaning remaining under lock and key until they die.
This woman has had her life ruined, she's fled the country and our legal system has decided to rub salt into her wounds.
Words cannot express just how disgusted in our legal system I am today...

People will sign anything.

Female Genital Mutilation is a barbarous act, it's not circumcision (something I'm ambivalent about) the clue is in the word 'mutilation' by which the clitoris of a young girl is removed to stop her enjoying sex and hence less likely to want another man. Whilst the practice is often carried out by islamobarbarians, it isn't only that group which carries it out, there are African tribes of various religions involved too.
It however sadly came as no surprise to me when an anti FGM campaigner brought out a fake survey for people to sign and within a short time 19 out of twenty people had signed it agreeing that FGM is a good thing despite the anti-FGM campaigner mentioning the word mutilation when asking them to sign.
Mail.

A female genital mutilation (FGM) campaigner was left in tears after an experiment intended to assess the impact of political correctness on the fight against cutting saw 19 people sign a fake pro-FGM petition within 30 minutes.
Leyla Hussein, 32, who suffered female genital mutilation as a child, approached shoppers in Northampton with the petition, which argued that as FGM was part of her culture, it should be protected.
During the 30-minute experiment, 19 people signed the petition and just one refused - a result Hussein blamed on the all-pervading culture of political correctness.
According to a recent study by UNICEF, as many as 30 million girls are at risk of being subjected to FGM within the next decade, in the UK an estimated 66,000 women are believed to have undergone the process and 24,000 girls are considered at risk.

Guess how many people in the UK who have been arrested for allowing this to happen to their daughters? The answer is the same as the number of fingers on your nose.
This is a barbarous crime and yet people blithely signed a pro FGM petition because the campaigner believed that she was  not white and they didn't want to appear racist. Christ on a pogo stick have we sunk so low that people don't listen to what's being said but rather react to how people look?
This blog had long railed against political correctness, the dumbing down of education and the inherant racism of multiculturalism yet until today I hadn't realised just how far the people of this land have fallen
This is a direct result of the application of something akin to the GIGO principle of computer analysis, it stands for garbage in = garbage out (a fact used to death by the global warming cult) Goebbels called it the big lie as in tell someone loud enough and long enough that black is white, sooner or later they'll believe you and the indigenous people of the UK now appear to believe that it is racist to question what a person of another colour tells them.
It's days like this that I know we're doomed. 

What the hell is wrong with these people?

Child abuse happens, we know this, there are safeguards in place to prevent it, both physical and sexual. That said, they aren't perfect and the system is only as good as those monitoring and enforcing it. However those who are employed as guardians in the social services at least need to know if there's a problem in the first place...
Islamweb.
Question

My husband has sexually assaulted our daughter of 14 years old. She says he came in her bedroom, lied down behind her, undress her undergarment and put his private part from behind to front. she is not sure if it was entered or not. he left it there a while and then went away. I have thrown him out the day I found out. He denies it but I don’t believe him. He says it is unintentional if it happened. Could I give him another chance? He says he realizes his faults now and that he was away from deen and zikr and it is very important to be focused with Islam If I look at whats happened I hate this man. but when I look at the 17 years we’ve spent together I feel emotionally shattered. Two people who have been told the situation say that in Islamic shariah we could no longer live as husband and wife after his action. I don;t event know if I can live with him anymore but would still like to rectify the situation. Please could you tell me is our nikah now haraam.
Solution
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad , is His slave and Messenger.
What this man did is a great, abominable and obnoxious sin. In addition to its being a great sin, it is contrary to the Fitrah and the natural predisposition of human beings as we have clarified in Fataawa 88782 and86063.
Dear Sister, what your husband did does not make you forbidden for him and it does not invalidate the marriage. However, you should conceal his sin and not disclose it to people, especially since he claims that he has repented and has become righteous, and that he even denies doing it.
Nevertheless, you should be careful of him and not leave any occasion for him to be in seclusion with your daughter lest he should do the same thing again as he cannot be trusted. Also, your daughter should observe Hijaab in front of him as long as it is feared that he would commit what is forbidden with her

Yep, that's right, take the pervert back as what he's done isn't grounds for divorce (or imprisonment) in the eyes of allah as he's sorry and he didn't do it anyway... though he clearly can't be trusted.
A truly amazing fatwa which essentially tell muslim wives to cover up their partners paedophilia. One wonders if this is why the paedophile rape gangs got away with their crimes for so long, the muslim women in the criminals lives kept silent, though there is evidence of police, social services and political collusion as well, as the state more or less fell over itself not to investigate to avoid being criticised for racism..
Unfortunately, shari'a requires 4(four) male witnesses to testify affirmatively for a rape conviction to occur - that is if the perpetrator did not confess.
This is virtually impossible. Muhammad himself was a big time rapist, and he made it halal for the ummah (global Muslim male dominated community) to excuse themselves such barbaric acts.
What chance do our social services have if a bloody online imam keeps telling the muslims to conceal their crimes?

A message from the EDL to the Archdruid of Canterbury

Telegraph.

The Archbishop of Canterbury has said he does not want to live in a "monocultural" society and condemned "unacceptable" and "inexcusable" attacks on Muslims over recent weeks.

Apart from the fact that there have been little or few attacks on muslims other than by muslims.
Of course he could be using the Tell Mama data which has been proven to be made up of course
Telegraph.

Tell Mama and Mr Mughal did not mention, however, that 57 per cent of the 212 reports referred to activity that took place only online, mainly offensive postings on Twitter and Facebook, or that a further 16 per cent of the 212 reports had not been verified. Not all the online abuse even originated in Britain.

I rather suspect the Archmoron is...
Perhaps he'd be better off looking at what the people he's defending are actually up too...

2001: "asians" behind most racist attacks:

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1160552.stm
2006: white people are the victim in half of racist murders ("political correctness stifling debate"):
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/oct/22/ukcrime.race
Racist Murders of White Men/Women by Muslims
Lee Rigby (2013)
Kieran Crump-Raiswell (2013)
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2356211/Gap-year-student-Ki...
William McKeeney (2012)
kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/2012/10/15/racist-muslims-asif-...
Victor Parsons & Keith Needell (2012)
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2146328/Ali-Koc-Sadistic-ki...
Rosina Waller (2010)
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-11889364
Christopher Folkes (2009)
www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/4786313.Teenager_kicked_B...
Keith Brown (2008)
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1022815/BNP-hijack-murder-t...
Vicente Delgado (2007)
www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/146497/.html
Andrew Holland
www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/2036526.thug_stabbed_victim_the...
Christopher Yates (2005)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4463142.stm
Mary-Ann Leneghan (2005)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/4953362.stm
Kris Donald (2004)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald
Gavin Hopley (2003)
scot.altermedia.info/insecurity-ethnic-mixing/justice-for-ga...
Charlene Downes (2003)
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1552482/Missing-girls-body-p...
Ross Parker (2001)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Ross_Parker

Aaron Dugmore, 9 (2013)

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Dugmore
Christina Edkins, 16 (2013)

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2289518...-journey-school.html
David Ryding, 26 (2013)

www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news...g-death-race-5098626
Danny O'Shea, 18 (2011)

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Danny_O%27Shea


It makes quite a list of people attacked, missing or murdered by the none indigenous of this country.
Yet what does the Archdruid do? He attacks those who are exposing the barbarism in society by using figures which appear to have been drawn from thin air!
He even mentions attacks on mosques, most of which after some sensational headlines go strangely quiet after it turns out the perpetrators weren't white or English.
Basically he's attacking the majority for something they haven't even done.
Astonishingly he doesn't mention the bloodstained borders surrounding islamic states next to non islamic ones. He doesn't mention the plight of the Copts in Egypt, the terrorised Christian communities in Iraq and Syria the persecution of Christians in Pakistan ...
Basically the list of islamic barbarism is endless and the Archmoron chooses to attack some minor (if true) incidents!
What happened to Lee Rigby was unacceptable... What happened next whilst bad doesn't even come close.
The Archmoron ought to read the sign held up by the EDL member and perhaps contemplate that before opening his ignorant mouth to shove his foot in it!

Never forgive, never forget...

Eight years ago today the followers of the vile totalitarian fascistic creeed masquerading as a religion called islam added another chapter to the ever increasing total of their crimes against humanity.

The good people in London weren't the first, nor the last, but should have been the wake up call our imbecile politicians needed to rid us of this poison in our midst.
Instead we were told 'this wasn't islam'
Of course it was bloody islam!

For Gods sake!

Someone out there is trying to kill me, they are out there peddling the most ridiculous tales for the MSM in an effort to try and make me explode from apoplexy. I mean how else am I suppose to treat this...
Telegraph.

Teachers at a secondary school in London have been told they must not use red ink when marking homework in case it upsets pupils.
The move was condemned as "political correctness gone wild" and ministers were forced to deny the Government issues guidelines on the colour of teachers' pens. Tory MP Bob Blackman took his concerns to parliament after a teacher in his Harrow East constituency informed him the secondary school had banned staff from using red ink. He told MailOnline: "A teacher contacted me and said I cannot believe I have been instructed by my head to mark children’s homework in particular colours and not to use certain colours. "It is all about not wanting to discourage youngsters if their work is marked wrong. "It sounds to me like some petty edict which is nonsense. It is absolutely political correctness gone wild.

No, it's not the bloody government for once, it's some bloody namby pamby (probably socialist leaning) head teacher who appears to believe that kids won't get upset if they see a wrong mark in some other colour. Hell, I suppose if they do all marking in black, the kids won't know if they've done something wrong and the dumbing down of the poor sods by years of 'right thinking' (but actually left leaning) meddlers from the socialist lunatics infesting the education system can carry on apace.
I've said it before, but I'll say it again, the only way we're ever going to remove the evil left from the education system is to make all teaching staff self employed andon fixed term contracts. That way the good teachers will be retained and those who can't teach to save their lives can be allowed to bugger off elsewhere if they fail the school and education standards. I suspect most of the union activists will be amongst the first to go...
I enjoy blogging, I enjoy writing, but having to trawl through stuff like this really makes it harder to keep this going some days.

Promises, promises, always promises...

Here we go again, Theresa May the Home secretary is 'threatening' to take us out of the European Court of Human Rights. Just not right now and with no indication as to whether she can actually do it or find the necessary support in Parliament to actually withdraw.
Mail.

Britain is set to pull out of the discredited European Convention on Human Rights that has allowed dangerous criminals and hate preachers to remain in the UK.
It marks a triumph for The Mail on Sunday’s campaign against the ludicrous abuses of justice carried out in the name of human rights.
The historic move, to be announced soon by Home Secretary Theresa May, would mean foreign courts could no longer meddle in British justice.
The European Convention has led to such hugely controversial decisions as banning the deportation of radical cleric Abu Qatada and giving British prisoners the right to vote.
Mrs May’s bold proposals to include the move in the next Tory Election manifesto reflect the party’s growing hostility towards Europe. If enacted, her policy would leave British judges free to interpret the law without interference from the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
Mrs May wants to withdraw from the convention before the next Election in 2015, but Liberal Democrat Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, a keen pro-European, has made it clear he will veto the initiative.
As a result, it is set to be a manifesto promise to be put into action if David Cameron wins an overall majority. Together with the Prime Minister’s vow to hold a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU, it will give the Tory manifesto a strong anti-European theme to combat the increasing appeal of UKIP.

Yes, the boy Clegg and his anti-UK party do not want us to leave the ECHR, nor I suspect do the (We've never met a terrorist we don't like) Labour Party who dropped us in it signed up to the damned thing in the first place. So what we have is a party looking likely to lose the next general election making rash promise to do something they are unlikely to be able to do anyway. Not that the Tories are responsible for the mess we are in, the blame foe that lies squarely at the feet of Labour who put the country in hock for the next few generations because they've never learned how to actually balance a budget and believe in the magic money tree of economics where loans can be taken out and the tax payer can be fleeced to pay for them ad infinitum.
No, what we have are signs of panic in the Tories who have realised just what ordinary people are thinking and that they don't have a set of policies to match. They are not being helped by their idiot leader who believes the centre ground rather than what people want is the place to be. Besides, the man can't be trusted to keep his (cast iron) word, which is why despite an open goal left by the most unpopular labour government in living memory they couldn't actually win the last election and ended up being saddled with Cleggy's pseudo socialist EUphiles.
What people want is that foreign criminals are deported so quick that their feet won't even touch the ground, that they might be killed or tortured when they are deported is not our problem.
We don't want 'the right to a family life' to be an excuse to stay, if their families love them that much they can go with them.
The claim that 'Europe' (actually the EU) is low on most peoples priorities is true, but that doesn't mean the majority don't want out, just that getting screwed over by the government and criminals matters more. It may be a low priority, but it isn't unimportant and most of the Westminster political bubble have failed to notice this.
"We're tired of mass uncontrolled immigration, we're tolerant, but the diabolical solution to rub the rights nose in multiculturalism has done nothing but stir up anger amongst ordinary people who have to live with alien hostile communities in their midst. Again something the Westminster bubble do not have to do.
We want the government and the authorities to stop pandering to islam, shariah law is barbaric and has no place in a moder civilisation, or indeed any civilisation. If muslims want to practice it, fine, they can practice it back in the shitholes that call themselves islamic republics, they shouldn't be allowed to practice it here, nor use it as an excuse for barbarism, grooming or other vile acts.
We're sick of being told about climate change, we're sick of paying through the nose for 'renewable' energy scams schemes that don't work and cost the bloody earth to maintain or supply not anything like enough energy. We're sitting on coal and shale gas, we can keep the lights on for hundreds of years by using those resources, but no, too many politicians are on the take via the 'green' energy supply scam, so we'll freeze and the lights will go out.
The problem Theresa May and politicians really face is politicians, they are the ones who have wrecked this country and allowed an evil festering cancer to grow amongst its people. They are the ones responsible for the lights going out. They must be the ones to pay...
Anyone who votes for the big three is letting this country down, I don't care who you vote for, but if you love this country, do not let it be the Lib/Lab/Con.

Follow the money

For years now we've had global warming climate change global climate disruption rammed down our throats by the government in its attempts to get us to stump up for something we neither need nor want. The government and ministers with interests in energy scam renewable energy schemes have taken us to the cleaners to the point where so called energy poverty is a major factor in most peoples lives. They have driven many to the point in a cold winter of having to decide whether to stay warm or eat. people have died from hypothermia as the vulnerable in our society have been culled by various government ministers and their attempts to make themselves rich by using taxpayers money to subsidise companies and organisations they are on the board of or in the case of the boy Clegg, his Mrs.
Mail.

Like all MPs, Tim Yeo is paid £65,000 a year. But he never has to make do with just that. Last year alone, three ‘green’ companies paid the Conservative MP for South Suffolk £135,970.
For this, he usually did just a few hours’ work a month. Yet he may be the firms’ most valuable asset, as Mr Yeo is chairman of the Commons Select Committee on Energy and Climate Change, and so plays a key role in shaping the green economy in which his sometime employers – AFC Energy, Eco City Vehicles and TMO Renewables – operate.
And he may be about to perform his most valuable service yet.
Mr Yeo has moved an extraordinary amendment to the Energy Bill that would set a crippling and binding target for the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by generating power in 2030. It would transform the electricity industry and bring huge benefits to the business sector, which has so generously rewarded Mr Yeo.
For the rest of us, however, the effects will be very different. It will cause already high energy bills to soar further and could lead to more power cuts. The effect on business is likely to be even more dramatic.
Yet despite the considerable drawbacks, the amendment is likely to be passed into law. Following intense campaigning by an alliance of dozens of green pressure groups and renewable-energy firms, the move has won the support of Labour, many backbench Liberal Democrats and some Tories, which may be enough to push it through Parliament.
‘Even without the amendment, the long-term consequences of the Bill will be horrible,’ said Professor Gordon Hughes of Edinburgh University, one of Britain’s leading experts on energy economics. He issued a strong warning the ‘surreal’ amendment could spell the end of British industry. ‘It’s a recipe for deindustrialisation,’ he said.

Yet I doubt Tim Yeo gives a flying fart as to whether there are no jobs left or that people will die because of his greed, he'll be alright living it up somewhere warm whilst this country goes down the tube, most of those involved in the scam will. The enviroloons won't mind either, their end game is a massive population die down and a return to a medieval economy where a rich elite lords it over an impoverished masses who struggle to survive, but at least it will be a green economy. Pity that Brazil, China and India won't play the game, but at least they can wreck this country as an example to others of allowing an idea with no basis in truth, sanity or reality to take root in the minds of an avaricious elite.
There is no global warming, there never was other than the feverish imaginations of enviroloons seeking funding and power. Well they found a good match with UK politicians who saw the fear factor as a way of making lots of money.
They even know the game is up, but are determined to milk us for a few more years. One day I hope we'll have them in our power, I have my doubts though, like rats, they always know when to leave the ship. The ones we'll get will be the fall guys and that will never be enough...

When in a hole...

Stop digging.
So, the UK has lost its treasured AAA credit rating mostly because the morons who purport to rule us don't have the balls to stop spending and trim the budget to suit our means. Of course you have the likes of the moronic BBC and various others of the hard of thinking (AKA the liberal left) who are blaming the governments 'austerity' measures though how they equate austerity to increased levels of borrowing is beyond me, but as I said, they are the hard of thinking and I have to presume that they believe that robbing future generations to maintain their lifestyles is a price worth paying and the future generations problem.
BBC.

Labour has attacked the government's economic policy after the UK lost its AAA credit rating, but the coalition says it is "making progress".
Shadow chancellor Ed Balls said the downgrade was a "humiliating blow" for the chancellor, urging him to act fast to "kick-start our flatlining economy".
But chief secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander said the government was getting Britain "back on track".
Ratings agency Moody's cut the UK's top rate to Aa1.
The agency, which is the first to downgrade the country's rating since 1978, said it had done so due to expectations that growth will "remain sluggish over the next few years".

This would be the same Ed Balls who presided over the ruinous tax and spend policies of Labour carried on by the coagulation who caused the damned problem in the first place. It's the equivalent of an arsonist advising that the best way to put out a fire is by pouring more petrol on it.
The government need to stop spending and cut back on the services it offers. It needs to reduce its total manpower size and STOP BLOODY SPENDING!
I mean if the average family behaved in a manner that this government (and the previous one) acted we'd be arrested or have the bailiffs around to try and recoup their losses. The morons are actually borrowing to repay debt and making sure that the next few generations are going to curse us to high heaven for landing them with our problem. They're going to get the keys to the house as part of their inheritance and find that the house is mortgaged to the hilt and that someone very unsympathetic actually owns it anyway!
The government of this country it seems is far to precious to be left in the hands of politicians, we need to hang them all now, followed by the lawyers and the heads of the civil services coupled with a side swipe at the BBC.
It can't come soon enough...

'Might'

There are some jobs where getting it wrong does not have grave consequences, comedians and tv presenters etc. There are other jobs where getting it wrong does, firemen, police, armed forces etc. As a consequence we expect that those doing those jobs where getting it wrong have a higher commensurate reward and that mistakes are kept to a minimum. We accept that occasionally mistake will be made, however there are mistakes and mistakes...
Mail.

A 999 control room supervisor is facing gross misconduct proceedings after he told a woman 'you don’t need the police' shortly before she was raped.
The victim suffered a harrowing two-hour ordeal while her terrified children were listening in the next room.
She dialled 999 but abandoned the call after the 19-year-old attacker grabbed her around the throat. The operator heard a struggle and a man arguing.
Fifteen minutes later a supervisor called her back and asked a series of ‘closed’ ­questions before concluding: 'You don’t need the police.'
But the man could be heard whispering in the background forcing her to say everything was fine before hanging up and committing the rape in Southampton in February. He was later jailed for eight years.

That was not a mistake, that was incompetence, the report goes on to say that the supervisor 'might' lose his job. MIGHT?
Of course, silly me I wasn't thinking straight, after all this is a world where a psychopath in a police uniform can basically murder someone walking past and get away with it. A police force which can arrest 176 peaceful people on the suspicion they 'might' cause a crime.
So it clearly is a case that the supervisor 'might' be sacked, but judging from what has happened elsewhere, he 'might' even be promoted.

Ignoring the obvious

The Pakistani community at the heart of the grooming scandal comprises but a tiny percentage of the muslim community as a whole, yet they figure large in all the current investigations into grooming cases. Yet in the supposed report by The Office of Children's Commissioner into child abuse in the UK, guess who really doesn't get a mention...
BBC.

Thousands of children are sexually abused by gangs and groups in England each year, according to a report.
The Office of Children's Commissioner study says there were 2,409 victims in the 14 months to October 2011 - but the true number is likely to be far higher.
The report also identifies 16,500 children who were at "high risk of sexual exploitation" in 2010-11.
However, the government has questioned the methodology of the report, describing parts of it as "hysterical".
The report's authors insisted their tone was "measured", and some of the most harrowing details of child abuse had been left out.
The deputy children's commissioner, Sue Berelowitz, said the evidence indicated the perpetrators "come from all ethnic groups and so do their victims, contrary to what some may wish to believe".
She cautioned the "model" of Asian men preying on white girls was just one of "a number of models".

The problem of course being that all the 'other models' know what they are doing is wrong, which sadly muslim males of Pakistani origin do not accept. Nor does she explain why figures in the report state that out of 1,514 perpetrators identified, some 415 were Asian being the code word in the media for muslims of Pakistani origin and a terrible slur on the billions of law abiding Asians in the world. Indeed, this total equals 27 per cent of offenders and far in excess of the proportion of Asian people in the community at large, which is 6 per cent (of whom 3% would be male? and an even lesser percentage adult males)
So whilst I can accept that there may be a number of models ranging from lone white males downloading child porn and acting on impulse, the fact that over a quarter of the sex crimes committed were by one tiny community should be ringing massive alarm bells to the Children's Commissioner, but apparently they aren't, it's just one problem amongst many. Nor does the fact that these males are using their religion and culture to justify their vile crimes seem to have crossed her radar either.
The abuse is widespread, our cowardly government aided and abetted by the liberal left in the name of multiculturalism, political correctness and community cohesion have caused those who should have prevented it or sounded the alarm to be silenced.
We have been betrayed by these people!

Figures in the report state that out of 1,514 perpetrators identified, some 415 were Asian.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236045/Anger-sex-abuse-report-Sue-Berelowitz-turns-blind-eye-Asian-gangs.html#ixzz2Cqs7TENl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Figures in the report state that out of 1,514 perpetrators identified, some 415 were Asian.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236045/Anger-sex-abuse-report-Sue-Berelowitz-turns-blind-eye-Asian-gangs.html#ixzz2Cqs7TENl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Figures in the report state that out of 1,514 perpetrators identified, some 415 were Asian.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236045/Anger-sex-abuse-report-Sue-Berelowitz-turns-blind-eye-Asian-gangs.html#ixzz2Cqs7TENl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Figures in the report state that out of 1,514 perpetrators identified, some 415 were Asian.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236045/Anger-sex-abuse-report-Sue-Berelowitz-turns-blind-eye-Asian-gangs.html#ixzz2Cqs7TENl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Figures in the report state that out of 1,514 perpetrators identified, some 415 were Asian.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236045/Anger-sex-abuse-report-Sue-Berelowitz-turns-blind-eye-Asian-gangs.html#ixzz2Cqs7TENl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Another asylum seeker? Hopefully not.

Cameron it seems (as ever) is not getting the point about letting known terrorist suspects free travel the world over...
Mail.

Syrian president Bashar Assad could be allowed to flee his country if it would end the bloodshed, David Cameron said today.
The Prime Minister said it would do ‘anything to get that man out of the country’ but refused to offer Assad a safe haven in Britain.
Mr Cameron is on the second day of a tour of the Gulf and Middle East, where he has faced criticism for trying to sell UK arms to countries with questionable human rights records.
But the PM has also publicly backed the Arab Spring uprisings, which began in Tunisia and also saw governments swept aside in Libya, Egypt and Yemen.
In Syria there have been bloody battles for more 18 months, with tens of thousands of protestors killed by government forces.

So, he can leave, but not come here? Not exactly a great option now is it Dave? Assad is holding onto power by the skin of his teeth, he won't try to run unless he has a bolt hole to go to if he thinks he's losing. Why Cameron thinks it's his duty to interfere with another countries civil war is beyond me either, I was quite happy to see muslims killing each other in Syria and all over the middle east so long as they weren't trying to kill us or ours.
What the UK (such as it is) should be doing is heading towards a state where we aren't a major player on the world stage, a bit of armed isolation is called for where we only defend what's ours and not get involved in anyone else's wars.
Why Cameron should be criticised for selling arms is beyond me either, so long as they don't end up being used against us we should sell them everything they want. A questionable human rights record is not our business, selling them the rope to hang themselves is.

More money grabbing

Cleggy boy is at it again, his latest idea to dip his hands ever deeper into our pockets to subsidise child care.
Telegraph.

Nursery fees could be subsidised by the state after Nick Clegg promised he would work to end the “nightmare” of high child care bills.
The Deputy Prime Minister said it was absurd that hundreds of thousands of women felt it was not worth returning to work after having a baby because child care was so expensive.
In the first of a series of “informal” emails to party supporters, the Liberal Democrat leader disclosed that he would be lobbying in Whitehall for more money to be spent on reducing the cost of nursery places.
One policy likely to be considered is increasing the state-funded free child care allowance for three- and four-year-olds from 15 hours a week to 25.
The Lib Dems are expected to press for changes in talks with David Cameron and George Osborne ahead of the Chancellor’s autumn Budget statement next month.
Currently, an estimated one million women who could work are not doing so, partly because child care costs in Britain are among the highest in Europe.
Parents are spending up to £15,000 a year on nursery fees, while part-time child care in London costs up to £130 a week, recent figures suggest.

He'd actually do better to look at exactly why the UK's child care costs are the highest in Europe, rather than as is the usual socialist solution to rob Peter to pay Paul.
There are several reasons for high childcare costs, the minimum wage, the cost of building rent and insurance and the cost of CRB registration for staff turnover. No doubt there are others, but those are the main ones I can think of.
Yes the reason childcare costs are so high is because the state has made them high, not because childcare provider are (necessarily) greedy. That plus the current UK trend of more or less insisting that dual income is a necessity in order to afford ever more new thins (or simply make ends meet) means that women need childcare provision, yet are wondering why they bother as the extra work they do unless they are really well paid simply covers the childcare costs.
So what is Cleggs solution? Well he wants to shake the magic money tree to subsidise the costs, rather than remove the legislation which makes it so expensive. He wants the taxpayer, many of whom do not have kids in childcare to subsidise those who do.
Is anyone else out there sick of their taxes going to pay for people not to work or paying for the childcare costs of those who do?
Clegg really doesn't get it, or if he does he doesn't care, after all he's stinking rich.
IT'S MY MONEY YOU GREEDY BASTARDS, KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF IT!
Clear enough?

Amnesty

Why can politicians of the left never grasp the obvious? Is it some form of cognitive disfunction or some macabre plot to keep the rest of us off balance whilst they go about making wrecking the world in their own image?
BBC.

Salford and Eccles MP Hazel Blears has called for a gun amnesty following a spate of shootings in Salford.
Ms Blears attended a meeting with residents and senior police officers at The Height Methodist Church in Irlams o' th' Height on Friday.
She said she backed a resident's suggestion for a gun amnesty in which residents are given the chance to hand in illegal firearms at police stations.

Why the residents seem to feel that criminals might hand in their illegal weapons is beyond me, only the law abiding are likely to hand in great granddads old WW2 revolver (sans ammo). There are several reasons these gangs are armed from the poseur point of view to the fact that all the other gangs are armed too. I know this, the police know this and any call to hand in illegal weapons is only going to take such weapons away from the law abiding which has been government policy for decades now.
What really needs to be done is for the police to have the resources to take on and take down these gangs, perhaps we could persuade the SAS to have a go, after all they're the prime reason the IRA are now part of the peace process, not the politicians. Kill enough of them and the problem will go away.
Not that I expect such a simplistic policy ever to be adopted by the government. They are far too happy with ordinary people being scared of those who have guns, both the criminals and the government...

The silence of the Imam's

A lot has been written over the past year (including this blog) on the sexual exploitation of underage girls by Muslim males of Pakistani/Bangladeshi origin. Whilst politicians and so called community leaders have tried to maintain the fiction that there isn't a racial/religious element to the abuse (yes we're looking at you Keith Vazeline) Yet the evidence kept coming including that of a massive cover up and wilful neglect from those in authority due to considerations of 'community cohesion' and fear of accusations of racism.
Always from the community and religion involved there has been silence, other than to claim it's all some kind of racist islamophobia yet all the time the accusations and arrests continued.
BBC.

Labour peer Lord Ahmed has called on mosque leaders in South Yorkshire to speak about the issues surrounding sex exploitation.
His comments follow a Times newspaper report of widespread abuse of girls by Asian men in the county.
It prompted MPs to order South Yorkshire Police's chief constable to answer the claims in Parliament.
Lord Ahmed said: "It's important that the community, rather than going silent... talk about it."
An investigation by The Times said a confidential 2010 report by the Police Intelligence Bureau detailed "a significant problem with networks of Asian males exploiting young white females, particularly in Rotherham and Sheffield".

Talk about it? How about the 'communities' involved stamping it out and handing over the perpetrators to the authorities instead? Or is that a rather simplistic way of looking at things?

Mr Ahmed said he did not know the reason why Asian men were exploiting young girls.

Apart from the fact that they aren't Muslim or Pakistani/Bangladeshi one must suspect.
The islamic religion in this country does not get a great press, its adherents attempts to blow up tube trains, buses, cafe's, grooming of underage girls for sexual purposes, spitting at our troops and burning poppies on Remembrance day have pretty much assured its deep seated unpopularity amongst the ordinary people of this country. Only the politicians, political classes and the utter loons of the political left seem to be somehow in favour of the rest of us putting up and shutting up.
They as much as the Muslim community are to blame for this utter disgrace to civilised values yet sadly as ever I suspect they'll shift the blame elsewhere (as the police did by arresting the girls, parents and guardians rather than the perpetrators) and bury their heads in the sand hoping it will go away.
Personally I'd settle for nothing less than stringing them up and letting them rot in hell for this outrage to our young women.