Flying the flag

Flying a foreign flag at a town hall can sometimes be a mark of respect but when it comes to the moronic left it's often a gesture of defiance. Back in the 70's and 80's Liverpool council and a few others decided to fly the red flag of the socialist revolution to show how committed they were to that set of ideals. Naturally these days they much prefer to fly the EU flag if they think they can get away with it, socialism having gotten somewhat of a bad name after the fall of their beloved Soviet Union. Still, we've now got another set of loons willing to court controversy by flying a flag which denotes another divisive subject.
Telegraph.

Tower Hamlets's Muslim mayor Lutfur Rahman has prompted angry protests after raising the Palestinian flag over the town hall "in solidarity with Gaza".
Just 24 hours after it emerged Mr Rahman is to face trial over claims he committed widespread voting fraud, he ordered the flag to fly "in support of a ceasefire and peace".
Jewish leaders condemned the move as "destructive" for community relations as local residents said the council should concentrate on 'potholes and bins' and not international conflicts.
Mr Rahman was a member of the Tower Hamlets Labour Party and was its candidate to be the first directly elected mayor of the borough in 2010.
He was expelled from the Labour party after allegations surfaced about his close links with an Islamic extremist group called the Islamic Forum of Europe.

Odd that if he flew the flag in support of ceasefire and peace he didn't fly the Israeli flag too, after all, they were the ones willing to abide by a ceasefire, not hamas.
I suppose next we can expect to see the islamic republic of Tower Hamlets flying the black flag of jihad given Rahman's extremist tendencies.
There are unfortunately few things more divisive in peoples minds in this country than what's going on in a small corner of the Mediterranean which is odd as it's got bugger all to do with us, having washed our hands of the place back in 1948. Granted some of it is to do with civilisation vs barbarism, even pro-America vs anti-America. Today it's the frontline against islamic extremism, yet still in essence it's not our business and it certainly isn't the business of the Mayor of Tower Hamlets, particularly as although he has a lot of muslims living around the area, some people do not care for Palestinians or their cause at all, even the muslim countries surrounding Israel treat Palestinians like something scraped off their shoes and only give lip service to their cause as a way of keeping their own people occupied away from their own corruption.
No, I expect this is simply Rahman's way of cocking a snook at the establishment and trying to garner a bit of support from the extremists in the area. Bit like the lunatic socialists did in the 70's and 80's with predictably the same results.

It's not complacency

Again and again whenever there's a problem to do with muslims some useful idiot is wheeled out to give some pronouncement about what islam is, who muslims are and what muslims should do. Unfortunately as the idiot isn't usually a muslim they are ignored by muslims who generally take no notice of non-muslims and the rest of us who have come into contact with real islam and know bollocks being spoken when we hear it.
Mail.

Muslim communities in Britain are guilty of ‘complacency and passivity’ over the threat from home-grown jihadists, the UK’s top counter-terrorism officer warned last night.
The Metropolitan Police’s Assistant Commissioner, Cressida Dick, said there were many cases where ‘warning signs’ about extremists were not brought to the attention of authorities.
She also indicated some Muslims were too accepting of radical views, saying it was the police’s ‘greatest challenge’ to make them ‘wholly hostile to violent extremism’.
Her comments came as the Government was confronted with a damning assessment by a former head of the military of Britain’s capacity to confront terrorism.
Lord Richards of Herstmonceux, chief of the defence staff until last year, said the military was ‘not good enough’ to deal with the global threat from jihadis.
The crossbench peer, formerly General Sir David Richards, called for a rise in defence spending and warned that without it, the effectiveness of the Armed Forces would inevitably deteriorate further.

I'm pretty sure such warnings were given over the Nazi party too.
No, the complacency lies with those in authority and the political classes who don't see the real threat because they don't live with it. It's the same reason that criminals get off lightly and the Human Rights Act has become such a burden on our society with its allowing violent criminals to remain amongst us. The muslim communities are not complacent, they've at best given tacit consent to the preachers who are encouraging  jihadism in this country as jihad as they see it is a noble cause no matter how ignoble its methodology as it's usually carried out against non-muslims and they aren't real people. That is the problem of trying to dictate to something that has tied its barbarism to religious trappings, you are dealing with faith, a written book and traditions which encourage barbarism and it's run by a bunch of imam's who see no reason to moderate what the quran and hadiths say, most of it coming from the life and works of a murderous child molesting slaver with a psychopathic god complex.
So no, telling muslims what they should do won't work, if you aren't a muslim then your words are meaningless, four times as meaningless if you're a woman.
Yet it doesn't stop idiots like Cameron and Cressida Dick telling us and muslims what islam is and what it should be doing.
Nor apparently those in power deliberately disarming our military strength to deal with them in the future.

Sick in the head

The wilful evil of some of those on the left knows no bounds, they are so convinced that what they believe is right that no underhand or disgustingly barbaric act cannot be justified in their twisted little world. They in the form of the UAF (Unite all fascists?) and their political masters the Socialist Workers Party (google sex scandals to see how bad they are) have in the past aligned themselves with child molesters, paedophiles, murderers, rapists, thieves, have tried to shut down debate by violence and generally made a mockery of civilised behaviour in the UK.
At the moment though the cause celebre of the left is Ukip and the evil little scrotes have come up with a wizard wheeze to get at the political party they despise...
Mail.

Ukip has been forced to scrap a freepost address - after receiving packages containing blood and faeces.
Nigel Farage's anti-EU party, which is currently leading the polls for the European elections later this month, has been inundated with packages from hostile voters.
The party used a freepost address on a leaflet for a campaign in Norwich in 2010 in a bid to drum up support.
On Twitter the local party posted a memo which read: 'You may be aware that there have been incidents of inappropriate mail items being sent to a UKIP Freepost address.
'This includes items which are prohibited (such as blood/human faeces) and present a health and safety risk both to you and our Royal Mail colleagues.

Now whilst I have no problem with Ukip shooting themselves in the foot by using a freepost address and getting bulky items and junk mail sent to it, you have to draw the line at biohazards. Only the truly sick of mind would do something like this endangering not only the letter openers, but those handling the letters and parcels as well.
Yes I'm blaming the left, the twitter trail suggests its them playing sick games rather than disgruntled Tories and it fits with the sort of spoiled brat mentality that they never seem to grow out of.
Yet the weird thing is, all the muck they throw (and apparently send) at Ukip only seems to increase their popularity, you'd think they'd learn. Though as this is the left we're talking about, they probably never will, their world is fixed with absolutes and anyone outside the vision they have is incomprehensible to them and needs to be dealt with, violently if necessary.
Still, at least they'll get a good drubbing in the Euro elections, not that it will stop their little activities, but it will give most of the UK an opportunity to let the left know what they think of their stupid little games. (as well as kicking the EUphiles in the nuts)

And who invited them here?

Tony Blair has a tendency to tell us things we already know when he isn't off jaunting with his faux job of bringing peace to the Middle East (nice work if you can get it, a bit like painting the Forth Bridge) Apparently radical islam is spreading and they pose a danger to western civilisation, something others said for years and got branded bigots and racists for mentioning...
Express.

TONY Blair has said the West must focus on tackling religious extremism, and called for further involvement in Syria and Libya.
Failure to shake off the legacy of Iraq and "take sides" with moderates in the Middle East and beyond could mean the 21st century is dominated by conflict rather than peaceful co-operation, the former Prime Minister warned in a speech today.
Mr Blair described a global crisis with its roots in "a radicalised and politicised view of Islam, an ideology that distorts and warps Islam's true message".
He said: "The threat of this radical Islam is not abating. It is growing. It is spreading across the world.
"It is destabilising communities and even nations. It is undermining the possibility of peaceful co-existence in an era of globalisation.

Now these sentiments might sit well with liberal leftards who are now only just realising that there is a problem more due to the headlines rather than having to live amongst it, but it shows an utter naivety about actual islam and what drives it... as ever.
First off, no one in the U.K. (apart from certain politicians,  leftards and libtards) wants any involvement in Syria or Libya other than to stop the buggers coming here, what's happening there is none of our business, so long as it stays there. The problems we have with islam all stem from inviting it in and it was mostly Blair's Labour who did so in order to get votes.
Secondly, whilst there may be moderates in the Middle East, they have a tendency not to survive and do not like to be associated with us as that makes them a target to the radicals, leave them alone and hopefully we can simply let them get on with things as every attempt to deal with the problems we face by direct action has foundered on the fact that those who replace who we displace inevitably are worse.
Thirdly, islam's true message is what the radical are preaching, not the moderates and its spreading across the world because of enablers like Tony Blair and other leftard politicians who didn't realise the threat until it had set deep roots amongst us and started to tell them what they were going to do.
Peaceful co-existance with islam is impossible, look at any state where there is a majority or significant minority of muslims and generally you find trouble, either in the way of terrorism or outright aggressin against their non muslim neighbours, hell the quran even tells them how to deal with a conquered people from wiping them out to making them pay protection money.
Blair like most politicians seems to have an idealised version of islam that only exists in his head, the evidence itself from those who live near or amongst them tells a far different story as to how peaceful and tolerant actual islam is... which is not at all.

Telling it like it is

It's often grimly amusing when the MSM discover what's actually going on with islamic extremism and seeks to present it as extreme rather than something that the quran actually advocates. The current 'Trojan Horse' scandal in Birmingham (and elsewhere) schools being a case in point where non-islamics are being forced out of majority muslim schools to make way for what the MSM and Ofsted call extremists or in my view actual muslims who believe what their paedophile prophet actually preached...
Mail.

A Muslim hardliner who says adulterers should be stoned to death and that gay men and fornicators should be lashed 100 times has set up an Islamic school that has received almost £1million of taxpayers’ money.
Ibrahim Hewitt, one of Britain’s most prominent Islamic firebrands – who also heads a charity branded a ‘terrorist’ organisation by the US – is the founder and chairman of trustees of the Al-Aqsa school in Leicester, which teaches 250 boys and girls aged between three and 11.
He has vilified homosexuals as paedophiles and said a man can take on a second wife if his first fails to satisfy him sexually. Mr Hewitt has published his views in a book on Islam, which he claims has sold more than 50,000 copies in Britain.
The preacher is the author of a book called What Does Islam Say?, which spells out his vision of ‘true Islam’. In it he advocates the killing of adulterers by stoning. The book says: ‘Any act that destabilises marriage will also destabilise society. Hence the Islamic punishments for such acts are severe… Married men and women found guilty of adultery are to be stoned to death.’
The book also advocates 100 lashes for fornication and sodomy with both men and women, and condemns homosexuality as a ‘grave sin’.
Mr Hewitt says in the book: ‘Islam, like most other major faiths of the world, categorically forbids homosexual practices (sexual relations between two men or between two women), regarding them as a great sin. In a society under Islamic law, such would be severely punished.’
He then compares homosexuals to paedophiles or those who commit incest. The book says: ‘If people have such desires [homosexuality], they should keep them to themselves, and control their desires to avoid forbidden practices.
‘The advice would be the same as, say, to someone who had sexual desires for minors or for close family: that having the desires does not legitimise realising them.’
The book also argues that men and women are not equal, and men have a right to assume leadership over women. ‘Islam recognises the leadership of men over women, but it does not recognise the domination of one over the other.’
He adds: ‘If a woman is unable to satisfy the sexual or other needs of her husband he may consider taking another wife, rather than the common Western practice of secretly taking a mistress.’
Mr Hewitt has in the past said that ‘political Zionism is a threat to world peace’ and has objected to the setting up of Holocaust Memorial Day.

Thing is, he's absolutely correct in his book about what islam actually says, same as the barbarians who butchered Lee Rigby were doing exactly what islam said.
That is the problem we face with the powers that be in this country and their leftard enablers in local government and public services. They simply do not believe what islam say, you saw it with Cameron and his pronouncement that what the butchers of Lee Rigby did wasn't real islam when it bloody well was!
So what we have is a concerted attempt by islamists to infiltrate and take over certain schools and start teaching what the quran actually says and promote what the hadith's (interpretations of the quran) permit such as segregation, paedophilia, misogyny, murder, homophobia and hatred of Jews.
This isn't just in Birmingham though, it's anywhere in the UK we've allowed the blight of islam to thrive and multiply. Essentially we've allowed an intolerant, political, mind control, supremacist, expansionist, thugocracy masquerading as a religion to take root in towns and cities all over England and dictate to us via the morons in power how they are going to behave and only now do the morons in charge realise the problem they have on their hands even whilst trying to deny its there.
Thing is, we don't know what's being said in mosques, we don't know what's being said in schools they control, but we do know the results of seeing what happens to countries they control and people they don't like once they get into a majority.
There is no place for islam in a civilised country...

A different meaning to the word charity...

Muslims are by their religion obliged to give so much of their earnings to charity, it's called Zakat which means alms. Under most conditions this is a good thing, and I have no problem with it being used to help out other muslims. However there are some muslims who stretch the term charity way past any reasonable bound until the pips squeak...
Mail.

Charity aid convoys are at the centre of a counter terrorism investigation over fears they are supporting Al-Qaeda militants in Syria.
Tens of thousands of pounds in cash has already been seized from relief vehicles travelling from Britain to the war-torn state.
Security services fear the huge relief effort is being hijacked by radical Islamists determined to support networks of violent jihadists.
British Home Counties suicide bomber Abdul Waheed Majeed, 41, was among those who travelled to Syria under the banner of charitable work.
He joined an aid convoy after his Crawley mosque raised more than £140,000 to help refugees in just a few months.
But Majeed left them to kill himself by driving an armoured dumper lorry laden with explosives into the gates of Aleppo prison last week.

Whilst generally I have no problem with muslims going to Syria to take part in the civil was there (whilst having grave doubts on letting the mad buggers back in here) I do believe that a lot of charitable donations to Syria are nothing of the sort and that much of it as ever is funnelled into weapons and explosives. It also bothers me that some Christian churches are supporting this moronic move considering what the muslim rebels have done to Christians living there. You'd think by now that people would realise that the quranic verse

5, 51 "O YOU who have attained to faith! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for your allies: they are but allies of one another and whoever of you allies himself with them becomes, verily, one of them; behold, God does not guide people who are unjust." 

Means exactly what it says on the tin, some muslims may be friendly, but their religion can twist them into something that is most unlikeable. Nor does there appear to be any sign of when the internal switch goes from normal to jihad which is a tad worrying.
Again and again we seem to be drawn into matters which are none of our concern. Sure I realise that where people choose to send their personal donations is their choice, but people ought to at least check out the basics of where the aid might actually end up...

So don't let them come back.

The government and law enforcement are apparently worried that the islamoloons who went out to Syria to join in their civil war might just be coming back intent on jihad here. Unfortunately it seems that they couldn't even do a half-way decent job and get themselves killed over there so the government is (sort of) looking for ways to keep them under control.
Express.

SYRIA's bloody civil war is increasing fears over the threat of radicalised extremist fighters returning to Britain.
It is thought more than 200 Britons are currently in the Middle East nation.
Already this year, at least 16 people are reported to have been held as part of a new security crackdown.
They are accused of returning from fighting in Syria or attending a training camp, or planning or attempting to travel to the battle-worn country.
One counter-extremist group warned the domestic threat from Syria's war could prove greater than that sparked by British involvement in Afghanistan.

You'd think that the simple solution would simply be to revoke their passports, it's not likely we'll have any use for them in the future if all they want to do is slay the enemies of islam now is it? Just imagine several hundred of the ilk that butchered Lee Rigby wandering our streets and turning any problems they have into violence simply because that's the way they think.
Not that I think the view that this is like another Afghanistan holds much credence, it's not like British troops are fighting in Syria, but unfortunately to an islamoloon an insult to one muslim nation is an insult to all, they are conditioned to believe they are at war with everyone including some sections of islam itself. Shia's don't like sunni's don't like ahmadi's don't like druze and so on down their whole perverted religion which coupled with tribal disputes between villages essentially means that the islamic nations don't tend to be good places to live and so naturally they move out only for the next generation to try and bring a little bit of home back into the system with the same tragic results.
Truly there is no place for islam in a civilised society.

Soldier of allah my a**e

I did think that when the barbarians who butchered Lee Rigby were allowed to go on trial that they'd simply use it as an excuse to expound islam as it is, rather than islam as our idiot politicians and assorted leftards want us to believe islam to be.
Granted it makes them look like utter barbarians, but giving air time or MSM time to these people is also counter-productive as it only encourages the other buggers to come out of the woodwork.
Express.

A MAN accused of murdering Drummer Lee Rigby told a court today he does not regret what happened to the soldier, whom he admitted killing as part of a "military operation".
Michael Adebolajo, 28, told the Old Bailey that he would never regret obeying Allah.
The defendant also claimed he loves al Qaeda because they were his "brothers of Islam".
The defendant told the court that his defence to the alleged murder is because he is a soldier and it was a "military operation".
"I'm a soldier. I'm a soldier of Allah," the jury heard.

No uniform, no country, no conscience. This does not make him a soldier but an agent provocateur  and as such ought to be shot... or even better drowned in a vat of pigs blood. You see saboteurs, spies and other military clandestine groups are subject to different rules if caught not wearing uniforms. That's why we have different courts for our armed forces as civil courts simply cannot know or take into account the stresses they are under. But terrorists are not and never will be soldiers, the clue is in the 'terror' part of the description therefore different rules ought to apply. It's also why our idiot politicians and leftards don't get militant islam, becuase they simply do not understand the mindset of these barbarians and will often welcome them into our midst without realising that they actually believe they are at war with us.
No, these men aren't soldiers, they do not fight like soldiers nor do they behave like soldiers, they behave like muslims are supposed to in the quran. They are terrorists, murderers, rapists, looters, slavers and overthrowers of civilisations.
They do not belong amongst us, now or ever.
That they are allowed speaks more for the failure of our politicians not to recognise the threat, they'd rather target so called right wing groups and their supporters for pointing out the bleeding obvious.
I truly fear for our countries future if we continue to treat this menace with kid gloves.

An apt choice...

An article in the Mail caught my eye, it's the usual mix of sensationalism and wind-uppery that the Mail's readership are drawn too. Essentially it's about a psychopathic rapist who served a prison sentence and then after release immediately took up his chosen 'hobby' with another unfortunate 18 year old.
Mail.

A psychopath who repeatedly raped a teenage girl just four months after being released from prison for an identical attack was jailed for life today.
David Brierley, 34, repeatedly assaulted the 18-year-old victim during a 45-minute attack in Swindon town centre in February this year.
A court heard how the victim thought she was going to die and begged Brierley to stop his violent attack but he ignored her pleas and carried on the attack.
Brierley, who is 5ft 10 and weighs 19 stone had been jailed for eight years at Warwick Crown Court in 2001 for repeatedly raping and assaulting an 18-year-old girl in a Stratford upon Avon churchyard the previous year.
But had only finally been freed from prison in October 2012 after being recalled for breaching the license of that release.

Well I'm glad he's been put away for life, though in my view life should have ended about five minutes after being found guilty beyond all doubt (not reasonable doubt) with a bullet to the brain and all his worldly goods forfeited to his victim. I could have gone on about the absurdly short sentence for the crime, or the fact that there were warning signs that he was unrepentant in his attitude owing to a breach of his license.
However it does appear that Brierley has made an apt choice for his disgusting crimes.

Brierley, who has now converted to Islam, had also unsuccessfully tried to change his guilty pleas after realising that he could be jailed for life and did not want to be portrayed as a 'horrible beast'.

Yes that's right, Brierley has taken the religion notorious for rape, paedophilia, child grooming, murder, extortion, theft, genocide and eternal victimhood as his religion, an apt choice if ever there were one. You can take a look at its founders crimes to see that Brierley would have fitted in perfectly with the false prophet of Islam.
That's not to tarnish all muslims with the same brush, many are good folk despite their religion, many not even knowing the crimes of its founder, though many were shocked at the Lee Rigby barbarism and the fact that its perpetrators were acting in the way and words of their prophet.
It's only a pity that the child molesters who have been found guilty of grooming our young women weren't given similar sentences.
Brierley again makes it plain that there's no place for islam in a civilised society.

You pay peanuts, you get...

Care home workers apparently, though I have to admit I do know of some care workers in old peoples homes who are absolute gems so this isn't an attempt to tar them all with the same brush.
Telegraph.

Residents were left thirsty and malnourished and staff falsified medical records at Orchid View care home in West Sussex
Nineteen elderly patients died amid "institutionalised abuse" at a care home where residents were left thirsty and malnourished and staff falsified medical records, a coroner has ruled. In five cases, the neglect suffered by residents at Orchid View care home in Copthorne, West Sussex, was deemed to have contributed directly to their deaths. Lawyers representing the families of residents said evidence uncovered during the inquest "showed signs of profits being out before the well being of residents". They also claimed that the Care Quality Commission had questions to answer over why it gave Orchid View a "good" rating in 2010, and why no steps were taken to intervene after serious failings were identified by a second inspection four months before its closure in October 2011. The home, which was operated by the Southern Cross group, has since reopened under a new name and management.

I've always believed that one of the measures of a civilisation in the modern world is how we treat our elderly, our infirm and our disabled and frankly it does appear that the UK is slipping into a form of barbarism where the elderly are farmed off to the cheapest institutions to care for them rather than families taking care of their own as happened in the past. Not that society makes it easy for the looking after of such, the push towards both adults in a family to have jobs has not made care of the older folks an easy task rather than only one breadwinner as was the norm in the past. The consumer society does have a lot to answer for, though that certainly does not excuse the actions of the staff at the care home.
Neither I or Lady QM have had to place any of our parents in care for which we are truly grateful, nor am I criticising those who do. But if you have no choice then it really does look like a case of caveat emptor with many of those involved in the systematic abuse still working in the industry as no charges have ever been brought to staff or management.
It does appear the UK is slipping slowly into barbarism bit by bit as money is placed before decent care and compassion.

Denial

Seems the barbarians who butchered Lee Rigby are denying that they committed murder, an unusual step to be sure considering how they filmed themselves doing it and the rants they gave. Then again as muslims they probably don't think it was murder, more along the lines of just offing a military kaffir and of no great moment as the barbarians showed in the Kenya shopping mall.
Mail.

Two men appeared in court today to deny claims they murdered soldier Lee Rigby outside his barracks.
Michael Adebolajo, 28, of Romford, Essex, and Michael Adebowale, 22, of Greenwich, appeared via video link at the Old Bailey.
They also each denied attempting to murder a police officer on May 22, the day of Fusilier Rigby’s death, and conspiracy to murder a police officer on or before that day.

No doubt they are hoping for their day in court to continue their vile rants about the demi-demon they call allah, though I suspect that we won't hear that much about their rants, just the odd media comment unless you actually decide to go along and listen to the tedious barbarians.
Cameron and other politicians have gone into denial over islamic violence claiming that islam is a religion of peace and that what happened was not islamic, though anyone who has read the quran and studied the hadiths will tell him or them otherwise. Then again anyone who does is either accused of racism (like islam is a race) islamophobia (it isn't a phobia when the danger is very real) or gets the equivalent of someone holding their fingers in their ears shouting "La, la, la, I can't hear you."
There are also immediate moves by muslim organisations and leftards to try and shift the blame in claims that muslims are the real victims of our justifiable anger. Claims of attacks on mosques and muslims often exaggerated (or outright lies) to try and garner sympathy, although even this is failing as the UK awakes to the enemies that politicians have allowed to infest these shores.
No, these guys don't think they've done anything wrong, they want their day in court to tell us this and blame us for their actions.
That sadly is islam for you.

I'd have thought it would be more...

Now I don't like islam, I believe it to be violent, fascistic, totalitarian, genocidal, warmongering, misogynistic, homophobic, medieval, intolerant and somewhat of a supremacist in it's treatment of anyone not a muslim male. That said, I don't have a problem generally with muslims as individuals, it's when they are in groups and essentially being told what to do that causes problems. Certainly there does appear to be something of a hair trigger between ordinary and jihadi and I'm unsure just what causes the switch to flick.
Mail.

A survey has revealed that many young people distrust Muslims and feel Britain would be better off if there were less of them in the country.
Of the 1,000 young people questioned in a BBC survey, 27 per cent of 18- to 24-year-olds said they didn't trust Muslims, while a similar number said Britain would be better off with fewer Muslims.
It also emerged that 60 per cent thought the British public had a negative image of Muslims and 44 per cent said Muslims do not have the same values as the rest of the population.
A total of 16 per cent said they didn't trust Hindus or Sikhs, 15 per cent said they didn't trust Jewish people, while 13 per cent and 12 per cent said they didn't trust Buddhists and Christians respectively.

No doubt the leftards in society now believe they have a major problem with young people being virulently racist, despite islam or muslim not being a race as such despite the best efforts of some to equate the religion with race.

The Government group blames negative media coverage of Muslims for stoking anti-Islam sentiment.

Yes, the media clearly should not have shown burning poppies, bombings in London, Boston and New York, butchery in Woolwich, Abu Hamza, Samantha Lewthwaite, Bali bombings, Al Quaeda, or show stuff like these pictures.

 

Yes, clearly if the media didn't show stuff like this or report the truth then muslims would be viewed much more kindly by the young and society in general. 
Well I've got news for the islamists and assorted leftards and libtards who cannot see the wood for the trees, you reap what you sow and islam has been sowing the seeds of its own problem in the eyes of others for decades now and people have reached the stage where they no longer are prepared to accept the 'religion of peace' platitude as favoured by the hard of thinking and lying muslim spokesperson. 
Islam is not, never has been and never will be a religion of peace. If anything most muslims are good people in spite of their religion, not because of it. Nor does islam mean 'peace' it means submission, and most of us are not prepared to submit to the vile creed it is. 

Out of proportion to their numbers

Most of the worlds attention is focussed on the islamic attack in Kenya today and the storming of the building to remove the barbarians holding hostages within.
Yet oddly enough a quick scan of the web pages of the BBC, The Mail, The Express and The Telegraph shows that Kenya is only one part of a problem with islam and muslims...
BBC.

Two bombs outside a church in Peshawar in Pakistan have killed at least 75 people, in one of the worst attacks on Christians in the country.
Two suicide bombers blew themselves up as worshippers were coming out of the city's historic All Saints church after attending Sunday Mass, police say.

Mail.

Britain's first Muslim free school is controlled by religious hardliners who ban children from singing or reading fairy tales and force staff to wear headscarves - according to the former head teacher and deputy who claim they were forced to leave.
Andrew Cutts-McKay resigned from his role as head of al Madinah School in Derby in August, two months after deputy Suzanne Southerland stepped down from her post.
Both allege they were 'bullied and sidelined' by members of the school's trust, which is predominantly Muslim. The school strongly denies the pair's claims.

Express.

A FAKE wedding scam aimed at letting Pakistani men enter the UK after marrying in apparently lavish ceremonies overseas was uncovered after photographs of the ceremonies showed different brides and grooms wearing the same clothes.

Telegraph.

Ozman Mirza, a British broker of Pakistani origin at Tradition Securities, says white colleagues yelled abuse at him across the trading floor and called him a "filthy f****** Indian" and "curry muncher". One senior broker even made the the Nazi salute, it is claimed.
Mr Davis said in a statement: "I am extremely surprised and shocked that the claimant's Tribunal claims contains serious allegations of racial abuse against me personally and other members of the FX Forwards desk.
"I wish to make it absolutely clear that I have never used any form of racist language towards the claimant or any of my colleagues. Nor have I ever heard or witnessed any members of my desk behaving in this manner. Had I done so, I would have reported it.
"The claimant never made any formal or informal complaints of racism or otherwise against me or my team."

Perfect examples of how muslims deal with and react too anyone other than themselves, although muslim on muslim civil war is also the biggest killer of muslims worldwide.
In Pakistan we see how muslims view any other religion than their own, they are literally cattle to be culled as and when muslims have a grievance... a pretty much ongoing situation worldwide as far as I can tell.
In the UK we see how muslims once they get into positions of power and authority proceed to put their belief system and ideals into place no matter the law or the legitimacy of their position.
By fake visa's we have an example of immigration jihad where although facilitated by Czech's,  male Pakistanis (and you can bet they aren't the bombed out minority Christians) are being allowed into the UK to spread their barbarism and undercut our own employment system. There are some libtard leftists who want an amnesty for illegals, I believe Stalin called those who would set the scene for their own downfall as 'useful idiots' it does seem apt after all.
Finally we have the grievance culture where a muslim once his lucrative job comes under threat immediately plays the racist card. It may be that he was abused, though the examples he gives are rather vague and no one else seems to remember them. Still, playing the race/religion card is always a good step, it almost immediately puts people on the defensive and makes them look the guilty party despite the failings of the accuser.
Four new outlets, four stories easily found about how islam behaves in the UK and worldwide and that's without the headline story of the siege in Kenya.
Yet we are constantly told that islam isn't like this by those who purport to lead us. An excuse growing thinner by the day.
The EDL leader Tommy Robinson (Stephen Yaxley Lennon) however nailed this when interviewed over the Lee Rigby atrocity when he said that 'this is islam' and as for the four stories above, truly 'this is islam' and it's only going to get worse until islam is dealt with once and for all.

Unwanted and unloved

Cameron was today deciding to recall parliament to decide what to do about the Syrians gassing each other, apparently WMD's are a big no, no in Cameron's eyes and he feels obliged to do something despite it being absolutely none of our business.
MSN.

Any intervention in Syria would not be about the conflict itself but preventing the use of chemical weapons by any regime, David Cameron said today, stressing no decisions about British involvement have been made.
The Prime Minister said there was never 100% certainty or a single piece of irrefutable evidence but said the world had agreed almost a century ago chemical weapons should not be used.
Decisions about British involvement have not been taken, he said, adding Parliament was the "right place to set out all of the arguments". He said action must be "proportionate, have to be legal, would have to specifically be about deterring the use of chemical weapons".
Mr Cameron said any action had to be legal, proportionate and a deterrent to the future use of such weapons.
He added: "Let me stress to people, this is not about getting involved in a Middle Eastern war or changing our stance in Syria, or going further into that conflict. It's about chemical weapons. Their use is wrong and the world should not stand idly by."

How on earth he imagines we can stop whichever faction in Syria is using the damned things is anyone's guess, take a look at Iraq to see the last attempts to try to use WMD's as an excuse.
I somehow feel that Cameron believes going in there might make him popular with his muslim pets at home despite all evidence to the contrary that they'd butcher him in a second given the chance as this young naive lady found out...

What is happening in Syria is a civil war between muslim factions and is absolutely none of our business. Our only business should be selling both sides arms to butcher each other. They are not our allies, they most definitely aren't our friends, now or ever, they are loyal to their family, their tribe and their abomination of a prophet and his barbaric god. The are not loyal to a country, they are not loyal to anyone who is not a muslim.
Sura 9:29 Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low. 
In other words they are obliged to fight us until we pay them protection money and we live by their sufferance.
That's why Cameron is playing with fire and that's why there's no place for islam in a civilised society.

Someone else we don't really need here

Just what is it about this country that makes it the target for every islamic loonjob as a safe haven to spout their bile?
Actually I think we know what it is, it's called the Human Rights Act and a bunch of extreme legalists lawyers who have schemed to keep the most undesirable people from being booted out to their just deserts.
Telegraph.

The new spiritual leader of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood is living in hiding in London in fear of state-sponsored assassination, it can be disclosed.
Gomaa Amin is understood to have been made head of the Islamist organisation last week following the arrest of his predecessor in Cairo by Egypt’s military rulers. Mr Amin, 79, had flown to London about two months ago for medical treatment and as a result escaped detention when the army seized power in a bloody coup. He is now residing at an undisclosed address from which he is trying to orchestrate the Muslim Brotherhood’s response to the coup. The presence of Mr Amin in London is a potential headache for British authorities who may be obliged to provide protection for such a senior and controversial figure. The Muslim Brotherhood supports a caliphate, a unified Islamic state under Sharia law, and has been accused of fuelling religious tensions in the Middle East, particularly with the Christian minority.

So exactly why is he being allowed to stay here? I don't want anyone who has influence over people who want a new caliphate or sharia law implemented over none muslims to be anywhere near my country. The man is a dangerous fanatic and should have been denied entry to the UK simply because of who he is. He will be a magnet for islamic extremists throughout Europe and the World  many of whom thanks to the Foreign Office (Aka the camel corps) were invited here under an open door policy tso they could avoid being offed by their countries governments. Abu Qatada, Abu Hamza and Omar Bakri Mohammed the well renowned hate preachers were all allowed here under such a policy and all caused this country far more problems than their entry justified... if indeed there was any justification for allowing a pack of rabid loons into the UK.
Perhaps we should do the Egyptian people a favour and hand him back or allow him to be 'offed' anyway... pour encourager les autres... as the saying goes.

A paltry sum

If a broadcaster invited along a guest speaker who told the viewers that it was ok to murder anyone who insulted someone else you'd expect that the broadcaster would face serious charges such as inciting violence, perhaps even being shut down...
Unless they are an islamic channel of course...
BBC.

The broadcasting watchdog Ofcom has fined an Islamic TV channel £85,000, for inciting violence.
It ruled in December that Noor TV had breached broadcasting codes after a host said it was acceptable or even the duty of a Muslim to murder anyone who disrespected the Prophet Mohammed.
Ofcom said the fine imposed today was so large due to the serious nature of the breaches.
But it stopped short of revoking the channel's licence.
Noor TV, which is owned by Al Ehya Digital Television, broadcasts both in the UK and internationally on Sky.
The programme in question, Paigham-e-Mustafa, was broadcast on 3 May 2012.
Presenter Allama Muhammad Farooq Nizami answered questions from viewers around the world about a wide range of issues relating to Islam.
One caller asked what the punishment was for anyone showing disrespect for Prophet Muhammad.
Nizami answered that "there is no disagreement about this. There is absolutely no doubt about it that the punishment for the person who shows disrespect for the Prophet is death."

It does occur to me that £85,000 is not a great amount, not in the broadcasting world anyway where revenues are quite high. It also occurs to me that any broadcaster that invites controversial speakers along should also make them very aware that anything they say that breaks the law will terminate the broadcast. Many radio shows use a one minute time delay to remove controversy particularly in talk shows where the unpredictability of the speakers needs a little added insurance.
The main problem is of course is what the islamoloon said was perfectly in sync with what muslims are expected to believe, despite our inbred politicians and associated leftards insisting that it's a religion of peace despite all evidence to the contrary.
So we have a sentence of death for anyone who disrespects a murdering, raping, child molesting, paedophilic, misogynistic, robbing, psychotic, lying, deluded, genocidal desert warlord who attached a false religion onto a war manual and set off to conquer the world.
It's difficult to see how the historical Mohammed can be insulted... unless the truth is seen as an insult...
Which to muslims, sadly it is.

What the hell is wrong with these people?

Child abuse happens, we know this, there are safeguards in place to prevent it, both physical and sexual. That said, they aren't perfect and the system is only as good as those monitoring and enforcing it. However those who are employed as guardians in the social services at least need to know if there's a problem in the first place...
Islamweb.
Question

My husband has sexually assaulted our daughter of 14 years old. She says he came in her bedroom, lied down behind her, undress her undergarment and put his private part from behind to front. she is not sure if it was entered or not. he left it there a while and then went away. I have thrown him out the day I found out. He denies it but I don’t believe him. He says it is unintentional if it happened. Could I give him another chance? He says he realizes his faults now and that he was away from deen and zikr and it is very important to be focused with Islam If I look at whats happened I hate this man. but when I look at the 17 years we’ve spent together I feel emotionally shattered. Two people who have been told the situation say that in Islamic shariah we could no longer live as husband and wife after his action. I don;t event know if I can live with him anymore but would still like to rectify the situation. Please could you tell me is our nikah now haraam.
Solution
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad , is His slave and Messenger.
What this man did is a great, abominable and obnoxious sin. In addition to its being a great sin, it is contrary to the Fitrah and the natural predisposition of human beings as we have clarified in Fataawa 88782 and86063.
Dear Sister, what your husband did does not make you forbidden for him and it does not invalidate the marriage. However, you should conceal his sin and not disclose it to people, especially since he claims that he has repented and has become righteous, and that he even denies doing it.
Nevertheless, you should be careful of him and not leave any occasion for him to be in seclusion with your daughter lest he should do the same thing again as he cannot be trusted. Also, your daughter should observe Hijaab in front of him as long as it is feared that he would commit what is forbidden with her

Yep, that's right, take the pervert back as what he's done isn't grounds for divorce (or imprisonment) in the eyes of allah as he's sorry and he didn't do it anyway... though he clearly can't be trusted.
A truly amazing fatwa which essentially tell muslim wives to cover up their partners paedophilia. One wonders if this is why the paedophile rape gangs got away with their crimes for so long, the muslim women in the criminals lives kept silent, though there is evidence of police, social services and political collusion as well, as the state more or less fell over itself not to investigate to avoid being criticised for racism..
Unfortunately, shari'a requires 4(four) male witnesses to testify affirmatively for a rape conviction to occur - that is if the perpetrator did not confess.
This is virtually impossible. Muhammad himself was a big time rapist, and he made it halal for the ummah (global Muslim male dominated community) to excuse themselves such barbaric acts.
What chance do our social services have if a bloody online imam keeps telling the muslims to conceal their crimes?

Another joy of multiculturalism

The left and the powers that be love multiculturalism. The left because it devalues the values and aspirations of the indigenous population and rubs the 'rights' nose in the differing cultures being allowed to settle here without integration. The powers that be love it because of cheap labour and a desperate need to give the public an 'enemy' and to keep paying the ever increasing tax needed to keep their various ponzi schemes going.
BBC.

Teachers, doctors and airport staff need to be alert to the problem of forced marriages over the school holidays, the government has warned.
Ministers said there were concerns about teenagers being taken abroad thinking they were going on holiday but being forced into marriage instead.
Figures suggest cases are particularly common during the summer break.
The government's Forced Marriage Unit received 400 reports between June and August last year.
Recent estimates suggest more than 5,000 people from the UK are forced into marriage every year.
More than a third of those affected are aged under 16.

Yes another joy of multiculturalism prevalent to the Indian sub-continent (mostly) and more to do with bringing in close cousins to share the generosity of this country and add to our health taxes by the genetic problems that close cousin marriages bring.
Naturally we are talking muslims here, though they aren't the only ones doing it, just the majority of it. This group are also the degenerates who believe the preying on and grooming of young white women is perfectly acceptable as they aren't muslim, Pakistani, nor members of the tribe hence simply worthless meat for entertainment.
And yet when people decide to talk about this, to protest about this, guess who the bigoted racists are?
That's right, it's anyone but the actual perpetrators of the problem.
Don't you just love the hypocrisy of it all?

Wrong place at the wrong time...

The two ladies from North London who went to the barbaric islamic island of Zanzibar have finally returned to the UK. Apparently the Zanzibarian authorities have questioned some people and came out with the title of the blog post.
BBC.

Two British women who had acid thrown in their faces in Zanzibar have arrived back in the UK.
Kirstie Trup and Katie Gee, both 18 and from north London, landed at RAF Northolt at about 13:45 and went by ambulance to hospital in west London.
Zanzibar police have offered a £4,000 reward for information leading to capture of the suspects.
A police commissioner told the BBC several people were being questioned but a motive had not been established.
The BBC's Tulanana Bohela, in Dar es Salaam, said Islam is the main religion on Zanzibar and in more remote parts of the island, away from tourist beaches, there are signs asking foreigners to respect the local culture and cover up - in case skimpy outfits upset villagers.

Now I'm all for being careful about observing local customs when abroad, my good Lady and I kept covered up when we visited Egypt, though we did get tutted at in the airport for holding hands by some old biddy. However it's becoming plainly obvious that a certain stripe of muslim believes they can inflict their view upon anyone muslim or not in the most barbaric manner possible. One of the girls had previously been slapped for singing during ramadama ding dong, by some islamofreak, despite it not being the girls religion. They were even covered up when the to barbarians on the motorcycle sprayed them with battery acid, so they were following the rules.
But rules don't count for anyone in an islamic area who isn't a muslim of a certain stripe, or female, or Jewish or Christian, because to muslims of a certain stripe we are the problem simply by being. That makes us fair game for bombs, bullets, acid and any other means of jihad.
I do believe that eventually muslims of a certain stripe will push us all to far and we'll deal with them and (probably unfortunately) a lot of other muslims who simply want to get by permanently and with extreme prejudice. Why? Because they are acting more and more like Nazi's every day and people will only tolerate so much islamic supremacism before snapping.
The day is coming when ordinary muslims will bitterly regret the actions of the fanatics acting in their name, mark my words.