Monday, January 7, 2013

So kick em out

Apparently the UK has enough illegal immigrants living here to fill three cities the size of Newcastle, though how on earth anyone can be sure of the numbers is debatable, after all they are here illegally so there isn't really a record. Most apparently live in London and all are from countries in the Commonwealth.
Mail. (Usual caveats)
Britain is hosting enough illegal immigrants to fill three cities the size of Newcastle, according to border officials.
A Home Office report says an estimated 70 per cent of the 863,000 illegal migrants are living in London.
The study also reveals that 10,000 foreigners who had no legal right to live in Britain have been granted permission to stay under the so-called 14-year rule.
It means they managed to stay in the country for so long without being booted out that the Government has now given up the fight.
Ministers say the situation is a legacy of Labour's shambolic handling of border controls.
The illegal immigrants are a mixture of those who sneaked into Britain in the back of lorries and those who arrived on visas but never went home.
The Home Office says the top five countries from which the illegals have arrived are believed to be India, Nigeria, Pakistan, China, and Bangladesh.
Ok, first thing the government should do is change the 14 year rule to indefinitely.
Second, make sure anyone caught gets one appeal and no legal aid.
You lose you're out and all your worldly goods are sold to pay your fare.
If you claim under the HRA that you have the right to a family life then your family has the right to go with you, at their own cost.
Draconian? Yes.
Workable? I believe so, we could even tattoo their foreheads as a warning to prospective employers if they try to get back in say a third time.
The problem is that we've tied ourselves down in Labours abortion of a Human Rights Act which came on top of their opening the floodgates of uncontrolled immigration. In essence they made it impossible to get rid of them once they got in. I believe the term used was 'rubbing the rights nose in diversity'
Well, looks like they succeeded in rubbing everyone's nose in it not just the mythical right.

5 annotations:

cornishstu said...

One thing I have always said when they trot out the line that they are entitled to the right to a family life as an excuse to stay is that no one is denying them,just that it will not be in this country. I have never understood if there was a serious will to deport that this has not been used in rebuttal.

James Higham said...

Ok, first thing the government should do is change the 14 year rule to indefinitely.
Second, make sure anyone caught gets one appeal and no legal aid.
You lose you're out and all your worldly goods are sold to pay your fare.
If you claim under the HRA that you have the right to a family life then your family has the right to go with you, at their own cost.

Like it.

Fahrenheit211 said...

One of the problems with the 'right to family life' lines it is only seems to benefit those illegals and crims who use it.

What about the idigenous Brits who are being forced out of the cities of their birth becuase of an ongoing policy of importing third worlders (often with views that are anathama to our society)who monopolise welfare and health services, housing and jobs?

What about OUR right to a family life? What about OUR rights to live near extended families? What about our rights to send OURchildren to schools where they will not be treaded as third class citizens. What about OUR rights not to have Islamic rapists and paedophiles prey on our daughters.

The Human Rights Act only seems to be there for those who dont' deserve help, not to those who do.

The HRA is just another weapon against the British to be wielded by the Left.

Francis Urquhart said...

(1) Leave the EU
(2) Tell the ECHR to fuck off
(3) Kick the fuckers out without appeal
(4) If they come back, shoot the cunts.

Job done.

smalltownman said...

Thankfully here in Smalltown there are no immigrants. I guess we are just so lucky to live here.