Express.
TWO inquiries into claims that scientists manipulated data about global warming were yesterday condemned by MPs as ineffective and too secretive.
The row, which became known as Climategate, erupted in 2009 over allegations that researchers had deliberately strengthened evidence suggesting human activity was to blame for rising temperatures.
MPs on the Science and Technology Committee have now concluded that both probes into the scandal had failed to “fully investigate” claims that scientists had deleted embarrassing emails.
Yes, it's mostly MP's covering their arses, but it does give the first official signs that some MP's are starting to get worried by the web of lies and deceit implicit in the leaked documents and aren't very happy with the findings of the two investigations. It's a shame Labour MP Graham Stringer's amendment didn't get through, but that I suspect would have taken a miracle and run headlong into the administrations ultimate policy of milking us for all we're worth.The investigations were set up after around 4,000 leaked emails and documents appeared to show that scientists at East Anglia University’s Climate Research Unit had manipulated data to strengthen the case for man-made global warming.UEA’s Independent Climate Change Emails Review was led by Sir Muir Russell, while the Scientific Appraisal Panel was led by Lord Oxburgh.But the MPs said they had “reservations” about both inquiries.They criticised the brevity of the appraisal panel report, at “a mere five pages”, and said both investigations should have been more open to the public.The committee also said the emails review “did not fully investigate the serious allegation” relating to the deletion of emails and instead relied on a verbal reassurance that the messages still exist.Though the committee was split over the credibility of the inquiries, an amendment put forward by Labour MP Graham Stringer which said that they had not been independent was voted down by members.He said Lord Oxburgh appeared to have a “conflict of interest” because of his links to green businesses while the Emails Review panel included a former Climate Research Unit scientist.He maintained: “We are now left without a clear understanding of whether or not the CRU science is compromised.”
The warmists are losing the battle, they know this, but are still hell bent on getting as much cash for research out of the system before it all goes tits up, same with the government, one day someone will pull the plug and scapegoat hunting season will begin. MP's are notoriously good at shifting the blame, pro warming scientists and environmental groups should remember this, it wont be MP's who are hung out to dry, they'll just claim they were badly misinformed by the scientist and enviroloon movement. MP's will move onto the next great cash cow, probably biodiversity unless we hang them all first.
5 annotations:
yes and i hope we hang them soon,very soon.
They only do it to scare people into accepting a One World Marxist global state.
It's just leftie propaganda.
It's a very serious thing when environmentalists claim that everything is caused by anthropogenic climate change. It makes ACC the one problem which causes every other problem. Like bees dying all around the world from a virus or fungus or whatever is killing them by the gazillins right now. Its a real problem. But the greens say the virus is caused by climate change, so rather then direct funds toward finding a solution to the virus, we should build more wind turbines instead. So while the bees are dying we are putting up wind tubines to help them. Insane. The bee issue is a real problem, wind turbines solve an imagined one.
Actually wind turbines DON'T even solve the imaginary problem! Perhaps when a "Green" electricity tariff means that you only get power when the wind blows, the environmentalists might finally realise the folly of their thinking. Freezing their nuts off for a week in January should do the trick!
Please may the hanging of MP's & Peers begin sooner, rather than later ?
Post a Comment