tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3875365454966245098.post6346657033791687202..comments2023-06-11T13:12:20.435+01:00Comments on The Anger of a Quiet Man: Credo quia absurdumQuiet_Manhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09575652127079681825noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3875365454966245098.post-40007825648045623902011-12-17T19:33:12.317+00:002011-12-17T19:33:12.317+00:00I disagree vehemently Captain Haddock
Why? Becaus...I disagree vehemently Captain Haddock<br /><br />Why? Because the thieving toe-rags would just claim it on expenses, and we'd get to pay that as well as their legal expenses.<br /><br />My personal belief is that, as in a situation when someone over claims benefits, they should be made to pay back every penny - and then every one of them should be disbarred from ever holding any political office. Perhaps that would encourage something vaguely approaching honesty in the corrupt, self-serving, political class.<br /><br />OK, climbing off my soap-box now :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3875365454966245098.post-78730175029771578912011-12-16T22:18:06.224+00:002011-12-16T22:18:06.224+00:00It would be interesting to know whether the Westmi...It would be interesting to know whether the Westminster thieves were hit with the ludicrously named "victim surcharge" ..<br /><br />If they weren't they should be (everyone else is)..<br /><br />And if they were, there should be separate surcharge for each offence ..Captain Haddocknoreply@blogger.com